Monday, September 30, 2013

Can you please explain what happens in The Land of the Dead from Odyssey?

After losing the bag of wind given to him by ---Odysseus
and his crew row back to the land of the Laestrygonians, powerful giants who hurl
boulders at them, sinking all the ships but that of Odysseus and his crew. They, then,
sail to Aeaea, where dwells the beautiful witch-goddess Circe, who drugs a band of
Odysseus’s men and turns them into pigs so she can keep Odysseus with her. Fortunately,
Hermess appears to Odysseus in the form of a young man; he instructs Odysseus to eat the
herb moly that will protect him against the drugs of Circe. He then confronts her and
forces her to change the men back to their human forms. But, she seduces Odysseus, and
it is a year before the men can convince him to depart. Still, Circe instructs Odysseus
to take aboard sheeip on onto his ship as sacrifice.


In
Book Xi, Odysseus arrives at the River of Ocean in the land of the Cimmerians. There he
pours libations and the sheeps' blood as offerings to the dead spirits. First appears
the spirit of the young man, Elpenor, who passed out the night before and fell off
Circe's roof before the men departed. He begs Odysseus to pile rocks as a burial for his
body; Odysseus promises to do so. After this, his mother's spirit appears, but Odysseus
holds it back until he has spoken with the spirit of the blind prophet Teiresias, who
does appear and drinks the blood offered. He warns Odysseus not to eat Helios's cattle
at Thrinakia or he will die. Nevertheless, he will meet hardship and all his men will
die, but Odysseus will arrive in Ithaca. In response, Odysseus asks about the spirit of
his mother which he has just seen. Tiresias instructs Odysseus to offer her the blood
and she will approach him. So, when his mother comes, she knows him instantly; further,
she explains how she came to this land of the dead: Anticleia tells her son that
Penelope has been faithful to him, his son Telemachus farms his estate, but her husband,
his father, stays in the fields and beds down in the leaves, or he sleeps in the house
where servants once were--all because he longs for his son. But, she could bear the
longing for Odysseus no more and died.


Soon the spirits of
other women approach and Odysseus must hold them at bay with his sword, but allows them
to come and drink. Afterwards, men approach and Odysseus meets Agamenmnon, who relates
how he died because of the treachery of his wife, Slytemnestra, to whom he revealed too
much of his dealings. She had him slain and many of his party, as well. Next Odysseus
meets Achilles, who asks about his son, Neoptolemus; so, Odysseus recounts as much as he
can relate. Afterwards, Odysseus sees Telamonian Ajax, and entreats him to forget their
quarrel over Achilleus's arms in Troy where Odysseus and Ajax competed for the arms of
Achilleus, who had been slain. (Because the arms were to go to the braves man and the
Greeks could not reach a decision. But, because they could not afford to lose the two
men, the Trojan captives were made to decide. The Trojans chose Odysseus, and Ajax was
so enraged that he committed suicide.) But, Ajax has not forgotten, and he turns away
from Odysseus.


After this encounter, Odysseus sees Jocasta,
wife and mother of Oedipus, who killed herself, among many other figures of Greek
mythology. Odysseus is frightened by all the souls converging upon him to ask about
their families; consequently, he flees to his ship and departs.

What are some effects of a low hemoglobin level?If the person does not treat it with necessaryiron tablets and vitamins.

Hemoglobin is the respiratory pigment, the red pigment, of
all vertebrates. It is present in erythrocytes, where it has a role in transport of
oxygen and CO2.


When the death of red blood cells occurs,
their membrane suffering a rupture, hemoglobin is hydrolyzed and Fe is recovered.
Porphyrin cycle bursts and the fragments are metabolized by the
liver.


After the process, for each hemoglobin molecule
metabolized is resulting a molecule of CO. It is a natural process and it is a source of
CO for the human body, carbon monoxide which is removed through the exhaled
air.


The final metabolic product is
bilirubin, a yellow pigment, whose intensity of color means
the level of destroying of erythrocytes. If the rate of degradation of hemoglobin is too
fast, it can block capillaries, mainly the kidney capillaries, causing various
diseases.


The decreased hemoglobin, not associated with the
decreasing of number of red blood cells is called anemia. Anemia has as main cause the
deficiency of Fe. Because of this deficiency, decreased synthesis of hemoglobin, red
blood cells will be hypochromic type (low-pigmented), and smaller than
normal.


In haemolysis (destruction of red blood cells
faster than synthesis), associated jaundice is caused of bilirubin metabolite and
circulating hemoglobin, which can cause kidney failure.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

What are two positive adjectives that describe pride?

From the nature of this question, my guess is that
eventually you could be writing an essay on the "definition of pride."  The best way to
answer this is to brainstorm a list of personal feelings, experiences, and observations
that you associate with pride.


Ask yourself, "When is the
last time I experienced pride?  What led up to the moment and how did I
really feel?"  Now, you have to resist the urge to write, "I don't
know, I just felt proud."  I know this can be hard to
do.


My experiences will be far different from yours, so
I'll give you a personal example.  The last time I felt pride was actually the first
time I saw my daughter (who is 3) pump herself on swings without any push.  She had
thrown a huge temper tantrum the day before when I was teaching her how, then I saw her
at school, all by herself, doing it like she had been doing it her entire life.  I was
overwhlemed and felt successful.  I felt a
sincere sense of ownership at that moment, for something I had
invested in my daughter.  I wanted to claim her as
mine
in front of everyone.


Now I realize my
words alone are not specifically adjectives, but perhaps they will help spark you to
think about what pride really means, and come up with some on your own.  Good
luck.

In the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare, how does Macbeth's tyranny affect the entire Scottish nation?

Macbeth's tyranny undermines the loyalty that the Scottish
subjects have for their nation.  In the beginning of the play, Macbeth is the most
highly regarded Thane by King Duncan for his valour on the battlefield.  Duncan gives
him the title of Thane of Cawdor to honor the loyalty exhibited by Macbeth during the
battle with Norway.  In the eyes of all (except Macduff who is suspicious of Macbeth
early in the play), Macbeth is an honorable man, and they give their trust to him as
their king.  When the Thanes begin to realize that Macbeth is behind all the murders,
they leave his side to fight with the English army.  But this only happens late in the
play, and by then Macbeth's tyranny has robbed the country of a just king, a worthy
Thane (Banquo), and loyal citizens (Macduff's court).  At the end of the play, Malcolm
takes his rightful place on the throne, but there is the hint that it will take some
time to return Scotland to the peaceful land it once was.  Acts of tyranny leave in
their wake long periods of unease as shown in
Macbeth.

What could be the most significant word in Mary Shelley's novel, Frankenstein in relation to theme?As part of a thematic assignment that was...

This is quite a profound question. I would simply use the
word 'monster'. Ii would then be appropriate to consider the use of the word 'monster'
by Victor, and whether the scientist deserves the epithet more than his
creation.


An exploration of chapter 5, where the creature
comes to life, could provide a context for close
analysis.



I
beheld the wretch—the miserable monster whom I had created. He held up the curtain of
the bed; and his eyes, if eyes they may be called, were fixed on me. His jaws opened,
and he muttered some inarticulate sounds, while a grin wrinkled his
cheeks.



In this passage we
see Victor facing his creation and its attempts to smile and communicate with him. It is
Victor's callous actions as he rejects the new being he has made which mean he is more
deserving of the term 'monster' than the being he imbued with the
term.


Frankenstein is ashamed and embarrassed by his
creation largely because of its ungainly appearance. This shows the scientist to be
shallow in the extreme. Here he seeks to conceal the being from Henry
Clerval



I
dreaded to behold this monster; but I feared still more that Henry should see
him.



He is so terrified by
his own work that he imagines it overwhelming him - a foreshadowing of future
events:



I
imagined that the monster seized me; I struggled furiously, and fell down in a
fit.



Victor, the giver of
life, becomes incapacitated by the enormity of his responsibility and has to be nursed
back to health; all the time brooding on his
creation:



The
form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I
raved incessantly concerning him.


Saturday, September 28, 2013

Are there some examples in the play Macbeth that show that the three witches are evil?(i.e. Specific lines of theirs or Hecate's)

It is important to note that in Shakespeare's time, there
was quite a furor over witches and witch-hunting.  We, in the US, know something of this
story from the events surrounding the Puritans of Salem and their famous witch trials. 
So, for the average God-fearing citizen, alive when Macbeth was
written, witches were considered a thing to be feared, and there was certainly paranoia
about having a witch curse you with black magic.


The
question of evil is a major theme in the play Macbeth, and could be
considered, like Beauty, to be in the eye of the beholder.  The witches cast
spells:



Round
about the cauldron go;


In the poison'd entrails
throw...


Boil thou first i' the charmed
pot.



They call their
familiars (animal assistants) in the opening scene -- "I come, Graymalkin;" "Paddock
calls."  And both the cauldron of magical goo and the animal familiars are strong
signifiers of witches who perform evil deeds. But does this prove
that they are evil?  It is hard to say.


It might be true
that the witches, by a preponderance of evidence, are evil, but the question that
concerns the play more would still remain:  Are the witches and their charms responsible
for Macbeth's behaviour, or is Macbeth a free agent, acting with his own free will? 
This, more than whether the witches themselves are evil, is the question that seems to
permeate the play.

Write the balanced equation for the process when CuCl2 (aq) and Na2CO3(aq) are mixed

CuCl2 (aq) and
Na2CO3(aq)


CuCl2 (aq) + Na2CO3(aq)
--->


this solution would be a double replacement, in
order to do this right you much know the charges of each
element:


Cu (+2) Cl(-1) (aq) + Na (+1) CO3(-2)
(aq)


now you proceed to replace all the cations: (make sure
to remember the charges)


CuCO3 (the charges cancel out
because they both have a charge of
2)


NaCl


so 


CuCl2
(aq) + Na2CO3(aq) ---> CuCO3 + NaCl


now balance out
the equation:


CuCl2 (aq) + Na2CO3(aq) ---> CuCO3 +
2NaCl

Friday, September 27, 2013

What information might go into routine operational reports for different kinds of organizations and why would an organization need this information?

All the reports any organizations use may be classified in
three types.


  1. Routine
    Reports

  2. Exception
    Reports

  3. Special
    Reports

Routine reports provide information on
routine decisions, actions taken and results obtained in respect of the routine on going
operations of the organizations. These kind of reports enable operational personnel, and
managers in the organization to perform their on ongoing routine activities. These
reports also provide input data for detailed planning of operations and for other
routine activities. Routine reports also enable managers to review the operations and
ascertain if these are satisfactory. Finally routine reports provide input data for
exception and special reports.


Exception reports are
generally generated to draw managerial attention towards the existence of exceptional
conditions and problems that require managers to take actions that may deviate from, or
in addition to, the normal operational work. Special reports are prepared in response to
requirement outside the scope of routine ongoing activities of an organization. For
example, a project feasibility report may be prepared when the management of a company
is contemplating major expansion in manufacturing capacity.

In "Is My Team Ploughing" by A.E.Housman, what is meant by "whose" in line 32?

A.E.Housman's poem "Is My Team Ploughing?" is an imaginary
conversation between the young farmer who is now dead and the poet narrator. The dead
'ploughman' ask a series of questions to the poet narrator which are answered patiently
by him. The gist of the answers by the poet narrator are that the death of the ploughman
has made no difference and life goes on as usual:


readability="7">

        No change though you lie
under


         The land you used to
plough



 Finally, the dead man
is anxious to know whether his lover is still mourning for him. The poet
narrator, assures him that it is he who is now caring and comforting
her.


 "Whose" in the last line obviously
refers to the former lover of the dead man
. The poet narrator doesn't
want to reveal to the dead man the truth that it is he who has become her lover because
he does not want to make him jealous.


 The message of the
poem is that life continues to go on irrespective of some one's death. Lovers's vows and
marriage oaths are null and void once a partner dies.

Where is found the vertex of the function f(x) = x^2 + 5x + 1 ?

We have to establish the quadrant where the vertex of the
parable is located.


We know that the coordinates of the
parabola vertex are:


 V(-b/2a;-delta/4a), where a,b,c are
the coefficients of the  function and delta=b^2
-4*a*c.


y=f(x)=x^2 + 5x +
1


We'll identify the
coefficients:


a=1, b=5, c=1, 2a=2,
4a=4


delta=5^2
-4*1*1=25-4=21


V(-b/2a;-delta/4a)=V(-5/2;-21/4)


Because
the coordinates are both negative, the vertex is located in the third quadrant:
V(-5/2;-21/4).

Discuss the use of quotations from literature in Fahrenheit 451. Which works are quoted and what effect does it have on the story?

There are almost too many allusions in this novel to
list.  I'll give you a few to help you get started.


readability="7">

"It is computed that eleven thousand persons have
at several times suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the smaller
end." (Very end of The Hearth and the
Salamander.)



This quote is
from Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels. It refers to a land where
Gulliver travels and the emperor has decreed that everyone break their boiled eggs at
the small end.  This decree leads to a war.  Swift himself was being satirical and
Bradbury likely uses this reference to emphasize how far humans will go to avoid
conformity.



We
cannot tell the precise moment when friendship is formed...so in a series of kindnesses
there is at last one which makes the heart run over." (Beginning of The Sieve and the
Sand)



This quote is from
James Boswell's Life of Dr. Johnson and it parallels Montag's
relationship with Clarisse.  He cannot understand why/how such a strange girl is
bringing so much joy into his life.


readability="6">

Consider the lilies of the field... (The Sieve
and the Sand, while Montag is on the
subway.)



This is
an allusion to Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, found in Matthew 6.  In context it is a
reminder not to worry about material things, and in the context of the novel, it likely
refers to Montag's realization that his spiritual hunger is greater than his material
need.



Burning
Bright (title of Part
Three)



Reference to William
Blake's "The Tyger."  In the poem, the tiger is a symbol for a world where evil reigns,
but it goes on to discuss that everything in existence has a dual nature.  This title
for Part 3 is appropriate therefore, because as the world burns from the war at the end
of the book, there is a sense of hope for the future.


readability="10">

There is no terror, Cassius, in your idle
threats, for I'm armed so strong in honesty... (middle of Burning Bright, Beatty vs.
Montag)



Beatty's
reference to Shakespeare's Julius Ceasar here is a bit ironic as he
is taunting Montag (who here would assumedly be Ceasar) and making fun of his new found
sense of right versus wrong and "honesty."

Thursday, September 26, 2013

What is the likeliest reason that the townspeople react so strongly to the veil?

The intentional meaning of the people's reactions to the
veil, taken from the perspective of the author, is that they will see in his veil the
reflection of their own sins. Also, they will take a good hint that, if the minister had
the nerve to call himself a sinner, then they should be doing the same ten times more,
and they haven't done so. It is meant to be a message to shock the townspeople. The
minister's introspective look at his own life is meant to be a model for others to
equally visualize their lives and determine to which level they are living up to the
standards of any other church-going folk. The minister is also trying to demonstrate
that anyone can sin, and that admitting to weakness and sin is an act of courage, which
many may or may not like, but yet is a reality in everyone's life. In not so many words:
Nobody is 'holier than thou.'

How does Vianne describe the connection between food and family, friends, or community?

Although about half of the book is told in the 1st person
from Vianne's perspective - she is not a particularly introspective character.  In fact,
one of the beauties of her personality is that she tends to tell the story as it is
happening, she does not make any apologies for her thoughts or actions, but generally
speaking, she remains unbiased towards others and circumstances.  In this way, to answer
your question, Vianne never makes a direct connection between family, friends and
community.


In order to answer what is
Vianne's connection between these things, we must only look at her actions.  Her version
of events is straightforward and sounds as honest and unimbelished as if she were a mere
observer, rather than a participant.


Vianne uses her gift
of cooking (not just the huge feast for Armande's birthday, but every delicacy in her
Chocolaterie) to do two things.  One, to provide the kind of
comfort necessary for people to want to come to the shop and talk
She does most (if not all) of her relationship building over something sweet to eat or
drink.  She can "guess" people's "favorite" treat - and uses that charm to coax them out
of themselves.  Characters in the Chocolaterie find themselves opening up and sharing
things about their past, their secrets (hopes as well as fears), and their sorrows. 
Vianne is always willing to listen.


Second, she uses food
to bring people together.  Armande's party is only one example of
this.  Simply put, once a character has opened up (emotionally) to Vianne, she finds
someone else in the town and makes a connection.  She does not selfishly get close to
everyone and keep them all to herself.  Instead, she allows them to trust her - then she
helps them to make a similar connection with someone else.  In this way she connects
Armande to her grandson, Luc.  She connects Luc with his mother.  She helps Josephine
leave her husband - and in so doing, Josephine is able to make friendships with several
people whom she seemed afraid of before - including
Roux.


Vianne's gifts are cooking and connecting.  Through
these she uses simple pleasures to bring people together.

When the story says the men leave with "their case of liquid melancholy," what does that mean in Fahrenheit 451?

Literally, what has happened here is that the men have
pumped out Mildred Montag's stomach and they have replaced her blood.  They are leaving
with her old blood and the contents of her stomach there in their "suitcase," as the one
man calls it.


Bradbury calls this their case of liquid
melancholy because they are taking away the stuff that (physically speaking) has been
making Millie unhappy.  This is a bunch of liquid that has caused her to be
sad.


Of course, they are not really curing her.  What they
are doing is just temporary because the real cause of her melancholy is the fact that
her life is empty.

Describe how the components of a balanced diet contribute to an individuals health at different life stages.

First you have to think about what makes up a balanced
diet: fruits/vegetables, protein, whole grains/carbohydrates, and
fat.


At every age the body
needs vitamins and minerals, which will most likely come from fruits and vegetables.  In
fact, experts now believe (and vegans and vegetarians agree) that fruits and vegetables
supplemented with legumes and nuts can almost singly provide every nutrient the body
needs.


Fat, protein and iron are especially important in
really early years (under the age of 3) for brain development, which is why doctors will
tell women to switch to formula (if child is under one) and then whole milk after
breastfeeding.


Calcium and vitamin D (which aids the
absorbtion of calcium) is most important during growth and bone development (up to about
age 21 in males and about 18 in females), but then again it becomes important after the
40s with the risk of osteoporosis.  Much more prominent in women, osteoporosis also
affects men.


Whole grains/carbohydrates are necessary to
every age - but should be balanced by activity in addition to other nutrients on the
food pyramid.  Many experts are beginning to say that the original food pyramid could
have fat cut off the very top and be turned upside down - because it is actually
healthier to consume more fruits and vegetables than bread and grains.  Bread and grains
contribute to complications such as diabetes - because we are so used to eating white
flower, white sugar, and adding gluten to nearly all of our processed foods.  The fact
is, again, many vegetables contain the right amount of carbohydrates our bodies need for
energy - and taking in more sugar than our body burns results in the storing of excess
fat.


Finally, check out the article below.  It has more
information on specific nutrient advice for the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and
60s.

in a grasshopper what relationship exists between a spiracle and a tracheal tube? what is it's function

In grasshoppers respiration takes places through the
tracheae and spiracles. Tracheae are tubes filled with air, which have an opening at the
surface of the thorax and abdomen of the grasshopper through the pair of spiracles. The
valves of the spiracles are designed such that they open only to let in oxygen and let
out carbon dioxide, thereby enabling the oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange. Oxygen is
carried to all the cells of the body by tracheoles which are found at the end of the
tracheal tubes and form a link between all the cells and the tracheal
tubes.

Did Jerry get his assignment from the Vigils before the Goober did in Chocolate Wars?What chapter did Jerry get his assignment?

Goober gets his assignment from the Vigils before Jerry
does.


In Chapter 5, the Goober is called before the Vigils.
It is at that time that he is given the assignment to loosen the screws on all the desks
in Brother Eugene's room. He actually executes the assignment in Chapter
8.


There is actually no description of the scene when Jerry
gets his assignment from the Vigils, but a close examination of the sequence of events
indicates that the incident occurred after Goober had completed his assignment. In
Chapter 11, there is a special assembly at the chapel in which Brother Leon announces
that each boy will be expected to sell fifty boxes of chocolates this year. While he is
speaking, Archie reflects on the Vigil meeting in which Brother Leon had come and asked
the underground group's support for the sale. Archie had agreed because the fact that
Brother Leon had asked them was indicative of the power they had in the school, but now
that he is listening to Brother Leon talk about the sale to the student body, he is
having his regrets. Archie ruminates about how he will con other boys to sell his share;
it is clear that he has not yet come up with the idea for Jerry's assignment at this
point.


In Chapter 13, Jerry first refuses the chocolates in
Brother Leon's homeroom. No further information is given as to the reasons for his
action, and he continues to refuse the chocolates for two weeks. In Chapter 16, another
student reveals to Brother Leon that Jerry's defiance is part of a Vigils' assignment,
and that it is to last only a short time longer. To Jerry's own surprise, however, when
the two weeks of his assignment are over, he finds himself continuing to refuse the
chocolates of his own volition. In Chapter 18, Jerry gives the first direct indication
that his refusal to take the chocolates had stemmed from a Vigil assignment
-



"He'd been
happy to have the terrible assignment all over with , the assignment completed and life
normal once again."



In
Chapter 19, the Goober guesses that the Vigils had been behind Jerry's decision to defy
Brother Leon by not selling chocolates. Jerry admits to him that he is technically
right, but tells him that now,


readability="5">

"it's not the Vigils...they're not in it anymore.
It's me."


How is catharsis (literary term) used in the book The Great Gatsby?Can you provide a few examples and maybe the page number too. I would be...

Concerning The Great Gatsby, I may be
in the minority, but I don't think catharsis is present in the novel.  It is considered
a modern tragedy, but I don't think a modern tragedy necessarily involves
catharsis.


The end is not neatly tied up in the novel. 
Gatsby's death is an injustice.  Deaths in traditional tragedies may be unjust, too,
such as in Hamlet.  But in Hamlet the evil is
purged.  No such purging occurs in Gatsby.  Tom is alive and well
and as self-satisfied as ever.  Daisy escapes without consequence.  Jordan, egocentric
as she is, has suffered no loss in status, etc.  The world is not better off because
Myrtle, Wilson, and Gatsby are dead (see the last few pages of the
novel). 


If the conclusion is circular or tied up or neat,
in any way, it's just that Nick will continue to dream as Gatsby dreamed, and, who
knows, maybe some day these dreams will come true.  But the state of affairs is as it
was before.  Nothing significant has changed, except that a man who loved as few others
have loved has failed, and been killed in the process.  This is not
catharsis.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

How does Dimmesdale treat Chillingworth when the two meet and what does Chillingworth do when he sees Dimmesdale's transformation?The Scarlet...

As the Reverend Dimmesdale mounts the scaffold in this
third scene with the place of ignominy for the Puritans, he calls to Hester and Pearl,
his family.  Although his face is ghastly, there is something "strangely triumphant in
it." Hester, impelled by "inevitable fate," draws near against her will, but pauses
before she reaches Dimmesdale.  Just then, the Satanic Roger Chillingworth appears like
the devil "to snatch back his victim from what he sought to do."  Catching the minister
by the arm, he urges the minister to


readability="15">

"Wave back that woman!  Cast off
this child.  All shall be well!  Do not blacken your fame, and perish in dishonour!  I
can yet save you!  Would you bring infamy on your sacred
profession?"


"Ha, tempter!
Methinks thou art too late!" answered the minister, encountering his eye, fearfully, but
firmly.  "Thy power is not what it was!  With God's help, I shall escape thee
now!"



Extending
his hand to Hester, Dimmesdale tells her that the old man opposes him "with all his own
might, and the fiend's...Support me up yonder scaffold."  As the minister confesses his
sin to the public, Chillingworth bemoans, "Thou has escaped
me
!" and Dimmesdale tells him,"May God forgive thee!
...thou, too, hast deeply sinned!"


This, of
course, is the climax of Hawthorne's novel as the Reverend Dimmesdale reveals his secret
sin and clears his tortured conscience.  With the peace in which Dimmesdale perishes,
the theme of Hawthorne is illustrated.  It is the hypocrisy of the Puritan who feels he
must hide his sin for fear of ignominy and ostracism that damages his soul and body.  In
his last chapter, Hawthorne states his theme which Dimmesdale has thus
demonstrated:


readability="10">

Among many morals which press upon us from the
poor minister's miserable experience, we put only this into a sentence:  "Be true! Be
true!  Be true!  Sow freely to the world, if not your worst, yet some trait whereby the
worst may be inferred!" 


What does the chiffarobe symbolize in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird?

In my scholarly reading of literary criticism about
To Kill a Mockingbird, I have never come across a definitive,
well-agreed to comment on this.


The references to the
chiffarobe occur in both Tom Robinson's testimony and Mayella Ewell's testimony. As Tom
references this piece of furniture he reports that Mayella had an item on top of the
chiffarobe and she asked him to get it. He has also been asked to bust up a chiffarobe
in the past.


Mayella reports that the day in question was
the day that he had intended to come bust up the
chiffarobe.


Thus, on an interpretive level, I look at the
chiffarobe in two ways. First, I see it as a symbol of confusion. The piece of furniture
has a door like a closet, but drawers like a dresser. It is like it can't decide what it
is. During the trial, Mayella struggled between keeping the truth and her rehearsed lies
straight in her head. It is also in these moments with Tom that she is trying to assert
an identity, other than the one she has.


Another way to
look at it is that the chiffarobe is a doorway. This is a doorway that Mayella walks
through when she is feeling ready to commit social crimes.

What is the main theme of Shaw's Arms and the Man?

Shaw's title of his play, Arms and the
Man
is taken from the opening line of Virgil's epic The
Aeneid  
- "Of arms and the man I sing."  The play was first produced on April
21st 1894 and was a huge success. The background of the play is the 1885 Serbo-Bulgarian
war. Virgil's Aeneid is a military epic and glorifies war whereas
Shaw's main purpose in writing the play was to criticize the romantic notions associated
with war.  This is emphatically revealed in Act I when Bluntschli tells the scared
Raina,


What use are
cartridges in battle ? I always carry chocolate instead
;

Shaw's satire against
war proved very prophetic when  the First World War broke out in 1914. It was only then
that the British were cured of their romantic notions of war.

How did the economic prosperity of the 1950s affect the workforce?

It pretty effectively moved the manufacturing workforce in
the United States from the lower classes to the middle class.  The prosperity, along
with the fairly recent legalization of unions and collective bargaining, lifted the
workforce economically and saw the beginning of benefits, retirement, medical insurance,
etc.


In those days, it was possible for people working
those jobs to earn a living wage, afford their own modest home, and most importantly,
could do so on just one wage, unlike today's largely two-parent
workforce.


As pointed out above, I also believe that this
prosperity and the gains the workforce experienced created an expectation among workers
that they deserved and were entitled to the gains they had made.  Today, almost everyone
who works believes that.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

What does "I would the fool were married to her grave" mean from Romeo and Juliet?

This line is spoken by Lady Capulet (Juliet's mother) in
Act III, Scene 5.  She says it about her daughter.  What she is saying (and this is
really a terrible thing to say) is that she wishes her daughter were
dead.


She says this because she is mad at Juliet.  She is
mad because of the fact that Juliet does not want to marry Paris when that seems like
such a wonderful match to her parents.


By saying this, Lady
Capulet is sort of foreshadowing what will actually happen to her daughter -- she will
soon be dead, just as her mother is wishing for in this passage.

What is the relationship between Sonny and his brother and how does it change?

The basic conflict of the story, which is the older
brother’s story, is the narrator’s inability to understand and respect the life of the
younger brother he so clearly loves. Baldwin carefully establishes the brothers as
opposites. The narrator is a cautious, respectable family man. He teaches math and is
proud of his professional standing. Living in a Harlem housing project, he consciously
protects himself from the dangers that surround him. Notice how intensely he appears to
dislike Sonny’s friend, the drug addict, when he encounters him in the school courtyard
at the beginning of the story. However, the narrator is also compassionate, and it is
important to see, in the same episode, how quickly he recognizes and responds to the
addict’s battered humanity. That gesture prefigures his reconciliation with his brother.
Sonny, by contrast, is a romantic artist who is not afraid of taking risks to pursue the
things he desires. His passion for music makes him impatient with everything else. He
drops out of school. In his brother’s view he is “wild” but not “hard or evil or
disrespectful.” At the end, the older brother comes to love his brother by offering him
a drink, not because he is insensitive to the aspects of addiction, but his love for his
brother trumps all other emotions.

What is a theme of "The Lives of the Heart"?

From the poem, one must conclude that there is nowhere on
earth where the lives of the heart are not to be found. The power of life, in short,
motivates people to travel everywhere and get involved in everything. Line 30 (“Not one
is not given to ecstasy’s lions”) suggests that love and ecstasy are common human
attributes. Line 20 (“Go blind in the service of lace”) may suggest the sometimes
deleterious effects of work and effort, with lace serving as the emblem of a worker’s
achievement. The repetitiveness of words seems designed to echo the regularity of a
heartbeat. The repetitions of words suggest this detail, and the repetitions of
identical grammatical structures do the same. The visual and aural active verbs suggest
the human energy that is brought about by the many and variegated ways in which people
face the needs and challenges of life.

Where can you find evidence of Gatsby's devotion/obsession with an ideal, rather than an actual person[Daisy]?The first sentence of this question...

Jay Gatsby is a dreamer.  There are several facets of his
dream.  One is the Horatio Alger success story that involves discipline, hard work,
drive--the rags to riches idea.  This dream was begun in his youth, as his father
reveals, and one that he obviously has attained in his
adulthood.


The second dream was fashioned by Dan Cody.  Dan
Cody on his yacht introduced Gatsby to the lifestyle of the rich, and this lifestyle
becomes the second part of Gatsby's dream:  Cody's yacht "represented all the beauty and
glamor in the world."  Gatsby with his cream colored car and mansion in West Egg has the
kind of lifestyle that Dan Cody represented for him.


Daisy
is the third part.  What Daisy represents to Gatsby is more difficult.  She is the face
that he puts to his dream.   Gatsby is in love with Daisy's life.  In Chapter 8, we
learn that Gatsby falls in love with Daisy and her
house:



Her
porch was bright with the bought luxury of star-shine; the wicker of the settee squeaked
fashionabl as she turned toward him and he kissed her curious and lovely moth.  She had
caught a cold and it made her voice huskier and more charming than ever and Gatsby was
overwhelmingly aware of the  youth and mystery that wealth imprisons and preserves, of
the freshness of many clothes and of Daisy, gleaming like silver, safe and proud above
the hot sturggles of the
poor.



Daisy represents Old
Money, love, and more importantly eternal youth.  Attaining Daisy in the way that he
wants is impossible.  Gatsby wants to turn back the clock to the time when they were
young and in love, and when he appeared to her as a rich officer in the military, and he
could come and go in that glittering house of hers.  What Daisy represents to him is a
missed opportunity of the kind of love and lifestyle that had he been a rich young man
he would have had.  Having the wealth now does not mean anything because all the money
of the world cannot make Daisy a woman who never married and who never had a child.
 Neither can his money now make him a rich young man in his youth, who would have been
Daisy's equal.  This is the dream he is chasing.  It is this dream that cannot be
attained even if Daisy sleeps with Gatsby in the afternoons or leaves Tom and marries
Gatsby.  He cannot have her as she was in her "white girlhood" in
Louisville.

If tan a = b/c prove that c*cos2a + b*sin2a = c .

Give tan a = b/c. Then to prove that ccos2a =+bsin2a =
c.


We know that tan a =
b/c.


sina =  tana /sqrt(1+tan^2) =( b/c)/sqrt{1+(b/c)^2} = 
b/sqrt(b^2+c^2).........(1)


Similarly,


cosa
= c/sqrt(b^2+c^2)........(2)



sin2a = 2sina*cosa
is an identity


sin2a = 2[b*/sqrt(b^2+c^2)]{c/sqrt(b^2+c^2)]
using values at (1) and (2).


sin2a =
2bc/(b^2+c^2).........(3)


cos2a = cos^2 a - sin^2a is an
identity.


cos2A = c^2 /(b^2+c^2)- b^2/(b^2+c^2)...
(4)


ccos2a +bsin2a = c {c^2 -b^2)/(b^2+c^2)
+b(2bc)/(b^2+c^2)


= c
(c^2-b^2+2b^2)/(b^2+c^2)


=c(c^2+b^2)/(b^2+c^2)


=c.



cos2a
=

Monday, September 23, 2013

Analyze Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare.

CONTENT:


This sonnet is
essentially a definition of love. At first, the author classifies love as something that
never stops. Love does not change with life's changing circumstances or temptations, it
stays the course. Although time will affect the appearance of a lover, that does not
change the quality of love. Shakespeare staked his ability to write on the truthfulness
of this definition:


readability="7">

If this be error and upon me proved,
I
never writ, nor no man ever
loved.



LITERARY
DEVICE:


When you analyze poetry, you should think about the
speaker, audience, purpose, and style of the poem. This means considering literary
devices. It seems that the audience is vague, and Shakespeare himself is the speaker.
His purpose may be self-exploration and therefore determination of what it means to be
in love. As far as devices he used we see personification
at work for both Love and Time:


readability="10">

That looks on tempests and is never
shaken;
It is the star to every wandering bark,
Whose worth's
unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy
lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass
come:



Here love was given the
ability to look, and later to have the appearance of "rosy lips and cheeks". This
certainly demonstrates a sign of life which is a further level of
personifcation.


In the 3rd and 4th lines, Shakespeare uses
word play and repetition and
parallel structure with the
words:



Which
alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to
remove:



This affects the
reader because he/she has to think of a word being used as different parts of speech
than it was previously used in the sentence. It feels
clever.


Shakespeare is certainly a master when it comes to
expression.

Why is Manolin necessary to the book The Old Man and the Sea?

In The Old Man and the Sea, the
character of Manolin provides an opportunity for dialogue and an opportunity for
characterization of Santiago to be revealed. 


Most notably,
conversation between the two reveals that Santiago is considered unlucky by the
villagers, but is reverred as a great fisherman by the boy.  We learn that Santiago has
gone many days without a fish--so many that Manolin is no longer allowed to go fishing
with him.  But we also learn that the boy would rather go with Santiago, and that
Santiago will not give up and stop going.  We also learn that Santiago is
undernourished, and possibly in danger of starving, at least
eventually.


Through Manolin the reader learns that Santiago
is a great fisherman, and though the boy's opinion is unsubstantiated when the words are
first spoken, they provide foreshadowing when the boy turns out to be
correct. 


In addition to dialogue and characterization,
Manolin's taking care of Santiago also creates pathos for the old man.  The reader sees
Santiago through the boy's eyes, and thus feels sympathetic toward him.  The reader
feels the same sympathy that Manolin does. 


Often, scenes
that feature a particular witness create more emotion than scenes that occur in relative
isolation.  When Manolin reacts as he does to Santiago's final victory/failure, the
reader's emotional reaction is heightened by Manolin's
reaction.      

Determine a if the lines are parallel: x+y=1 and 3x-ay=2

To determine if x+y =1 and 3x-3ay =2 are
parallel.


Two lines  are parallel if they have the same
slope.


We know that the the equation of any line in the
slope intercept form is y = mx+c, wher m is the slope.


So
we convert the given  lines into the slope intercept form as
below;


x+y = 1.


Subtract x
:


y = -x+1 which has a slope
-1......(1).


So y = -x+1 is the slope intercept form of x+y
= 1.


Consider the second  line 3x-ay =2. Subtract 3x from
both sides:


-ay = -3x
+2.


Divide by -a.


y = -3x/(-a)
+2/(-a)


y = (3/a)x 
+(-2/a)...........(2)


This line has a slope of 
3/a.


If  the two line are parallel , the their slopes
should be equal;


Therefore from (1) and
(2),


3/a = -1


Multiply by
a:


3 = -a. Or


So if  a = -3 ,
then the given two lines would be parallel.


a =
-3.

Analyze chapter 25 of The Grapes of Wrath. Give a close reading, including the author's tone, diction, and syntax.

Chapter 25 begins with an omniscient third person
description of California's land and productivity. The sentences are long, and the
diction is formal and poetic, almost biblical, as Steinbeck describes the beauty of the
fruit plants and the hard work that goes into growing
them.


In the sixth paragraph, the chapter shifts abruptly
into a gruff, first person voice, presumably the voice of a farmer: "Cent and a half a
pound. Hell, we can't pick 'em for that." Now the descriptions show fruit dropping from
trees and rotting on the ground as farmers grapple with the economic impossibility of
profiting from the food they produce. A farmer makes rotting fruit into bad wine, saying
cynically, "Oh, well. It has alcohol in it, anyway. They can get
drunk."


From there, the chapter shifts back to an
omniscient narrator and sweeping descriptions, but the tone is much darker. Now the
narrator speaks of "great sorrow" as poor people die of malnutrition while crops rot.
These rotting crops are directly compared to the anger that is beginning to fester in
the hungry: "In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing
heavy."

What does Hamlet mean by lines 376 & 377 if he is aware that Rozencrantz and Guildenstern are spys?Surely the act of admitting he is playing at...

Hamlet actually admits to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
that he is not as mad as they think he is.  This line occurs in Act 2, scene 2, after
Hamlet has determined that his two friends "were sent for" and the conversation turns to
the players.  Hamlet welcomes the players, and seems to boast that he has deceived his
"uncle-father and aunt-mother."


Hamlet's words are
intentionally obtuse.  The fact that neither Rosencrantz nor Guildenstern reacts to this
admission shows either their lack of surprise or their disbelief.  Either they think
Hamlet was only pretending to be mad all along or  they really do not believe he is
sane.  I think it is the latter, and Hamlet feels safe in that the two  underestimate
him.  Rosencrantz and Guildenstern seem to be intent on getting to the bottom of
Hamlet's melancholy and are oblivious to the fact that Hamlet is toying with them. 
Hamlet continues to toy with them after the play-within-a-play when they try to "pluck
out the heart of [his] mystery."  Hamlet knows that the two are incapable of figuring
him out and do not recognize the truth when they hear it.  Hamlet toys with Polonius in
much the same way, insulting Polonius to his face, and calling him a "fishmonger" or
Jephthah, an Old Testament character who sacrificed his daughter.  He tells the truth,
much like a king's fool, but is not taken seriously.

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the native Ibo and white cultures?

In Things Fall Apart, the Igbo
culture uses a division of labor (gender segregation), polygamy, communes, and a
patriarchal hierarchy in order to sustain an agrarian economy.  Survival is the key for
the Igbo.  Males must work extremely hard to harvest the difficult yam crops.  They must
take many wives in the hopes of producing many strong offspring.  They must use
wrestling matches and titles in order to preserve the status of males.  What unravels
their culture is their belief in superstition (killing of twin babies) and their
underestimating the intentions of the colonists.


The white
British Christian culture is not agrarian and, therefore, need not be so integrated.
 The whites separate their religion, judicial system, government, and education into
institutions.  They rely on individualism instead of communal values.  They believe in
monotheism and monogamy because it is gives them a more personal sense of love and
security.  Since they wield greater technology and are more mobile, they focus on a more
conceptual view of culture (which is not dependent on the basic physical need for food
and survival).  Their weakness comes from their failure to understand the complexity of
the tribal culture and their heavy-handed institutional punishment of the
tribe.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

What role do dreams play in In Cold Blood?

There is a repeated emphasis on dreams in this novel.
 There are actual dreams and then "dream" can be seen as goal or aspiration as well.
 Perry has the dream of travel, going to Mexico, and seemingly being a the successful
man that he is not.  Perry also has the actual dream about the yellow parrot.  This
dream allows him to gain some sort of revenge on those who've hurt him over the course
of his life.


Al Dewey's wife also dreams of Bonnie Clutter.
 Later, Paul Helm has an almost dream-like vision of Bonnie at the window of her
bedroom, but it turns out to be a vagrant armed with a shot gun.  Most of the dreams in
the book end up like Paul's "vision"; an idea of something better that, in the end,
never comes true as we hope.

Is Macbeth responsible for his own actions, or do the witches control him?William Shakespeare's Macbeth

In response to this question, the reader must keep in mind
that Elizabethans felt that the supernatural world was in direct competition with the
natural world. Ghosts, especially, were thought to have a profound effect upon the
natural order of events.  Taking advantage of these Elizabethan beliefs, Shakespeare
employed elements of the supernatural world in order to create dramatic emphasis rather
than direct affect upon the actions of characters.


That
Macbeth wishes to make use of the supernatural as cause for his actions is apparent in
the first act:


readability="10">

If chance will have me King, why, chance may
crown me,


Without my stir.
(1.3.155-156)



But, he does
not deceive himself long about the influence of the supernatural being all that effects
events.  For, in his ambivalence regarding murdering Duncan, he admits to his tragic
flaw:



...I
have no spur


To prick the sides of my intent, but
only


Vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps
itself


And falls on
th'other--(1.7.25-28)



In
subsequent acts, also, Macbeth does not deceive himself.  In Act II, for instance, he
tells Lady Macbeth,


readability="5">

I'll go no more


I am
afraid to think what I have done.
(2.2.50-51)



And, in this same
scene, Macbeth regrets his actions without any blame attributed to
fate:



Had I
but died an hour before this chance,


I had lived a blessed
time; for from this instant


There's nothing serious in
mortality. (2.3.99-101)



As
his paranoia increases, Macbeth does consult the witches, but his actions in response to
their predictions are more in defiance of the supernatural rather than in accord with
it, thus providing the dramatic effect mentioned earlier.  In Act V, Macbeth
acknowledges the evil he has committed:


readability="29">

...My way of
life


Is fall'n into the sear, the yellow
leaf,


And that which should accompany old
age,


As honor, love, obedience, troops of
friends,


I must not look to have, but, in their
stead,


Curses not loud but deep, mouth-honor,
breath,


Which the poor heart would fain deny, and dare not.
(5.3.25-31)



Thus, in his
"vaulting ambition which o'er leaps itself," Macbeth chooses to allow the predictions of
the three witches to motive his own actions to be king.

Saturday, September 21, 2013

How does the audience react to the production of Hamlet in Chapter 31 of Great Expectations by Charles Dickens?

The presentation of Hamlet by Mr.
Wopsle is a farce, so poorly done that the audience reacts with laughter and derision.
Among the ridiculous aspects of the performance are the deceased king, who cannot stop
coughing even when he is supposed to be dead, and must read his lines from a manuscript,
a queen who has the appearance of a kettledrum, and a boy who plays multiple roles
almost simultaneously, and none of them well. The audience quickly loses patience with
the ludicrous performance, and reacts loudly, with sassy retorts and laughter. When
Ophelia, with maddening slowness, takes off her white scarf and folds it, a "sulky man"
shouts out from among the onlookers, "Now the baby's put to bed, let's have supper!",
and when Hamlet himself asks rhetorical questions in his soliloquy, "quite a Debating
Society" arises in the audience, and individuals shout out sardonic answers and comments
in response. Mr. Wopsle, in particular, performs laughably, and the audience does not
hold back in voicing its scornful displeasure.


The scene in
the graveyard is rendered especially poorly, and when Mr. Wopsle returns a skull to its
place after moralizing over it, and fastidiously wipes his fingers on a white napkin
before going on, there is a sarcastic cry of "Wai-ter!" from the frustrated viewing
populace. Pip and Herbert, who are watching the play, at first make "some pale
efforts...to applaud Mr. Wopsle," but, finding the play "too hopeless," sit there
laughing along with the majority despite themselves, even though they are "feeling
keenly" for Mr. Wopsle, who is the only one who takes the whole disaster seriously
(Chapter 31).

What life lesson can be learnt from The Road Not Taken by Robert Frost?How the techniques communicate this

A very good lesson that can be learned is to feel proud of
one's own choices, even when others say to us that they are taken in vain.


Sometimes we get two choices in life, and we realize that
one is better than the other. Yet, the one which has the least weight, least hardship,
and least risk is the one we choose precisely because it gives us perspective, and it
puts on to a challenge.


What we learn from this is that
many do not take the harsh, hard, and heavy trip because many might say it is not
necessary. Yet, those who do take it, and take the shot, and walk it through will have
much to feel proud of in the end. In short, like Wayne Gretsky said "the only shot you
miss is the one you do not take".

What are some good discussion questions about the book The Things They Carried?These are the 5 categories.... 1. World connection question ( a...

One question that I ask my class to explore refers back to
the topic of truth that O'Brien brings up in Chapter 7 "How to Tell a True War Story." 
In this chapter, O'Brien argues that people are not ready to hear the truth and that war
stories must be comprised of some level of fiction to make them palatable for the
listening/reading audience.  He also says that the truth is entirely subjective and that
details about an event are remembered differently by different people because of their
level of perception.  So the chapter begs the question of whether or not is important to
tell a true war story (or a true story in general), and if so, what is the nature of
"truth" for the storyteller.

Friday, September 20, 2013

Hamlet lost the love of his father, mother, and Ophelia. Why is Hamlet responsible for this?in Hamlet

I edited your question down to just the first part because
you are only allowed to ask one question at a time.


In
response to your question I would argue that Hamlet didn't lose the
love of any of those three characters. They were steady in their love for Hamlet until
the moment each of them died.  Hamlet's father was murdered by Claudius; Gertrude
accidently drank poison that was intended for Hamlet; Ophelia committed suicide as a
result of the deep despair over the death of her father and the state of her
relationship with Hamlet.  All of these characters deeply loved Hamlet -- there is NO
evidence to the contrary on that.


Your question asked about
Hamlet's responsibility in these losses.  Again, I would say that Hamlet's
responsibility is limited, especially in the case of his mother and father.  Hamlet has
absolutely NO culpability in loss of his father.  Gertrude's death happens because
Claudius is trying to kill Hamlet.  I guess you could say that Hamlet's revealing that
he knew about Claudius's murder of King Hamlet and his subsequent killing of Polonius
brought on the end of the play with Laertes seeking vengeance and Claudius wanting to
silence him, but that is kind of a stretch to then say that therefore, Hamlet is
responsible for his mother's death.  It could even be suggested that Gertrude drank the
poison as a direct defiance of Claudius and that she was attempting to save Hamlet from
drinking it.


The only character Hamlet is really in any
directly way responsible for is Ophelia.  Hamlet puts on his crazy act with Ophelia,
leaving her very confused about the state of their relationship.  When he realizes that
she is being used by her father, he is rude and condemning of her, commanding "get thee
to a nunnery!"  She is heartbroken and confused when he is flirts with her during the
play-within-a-play scene.  When she finds out that her father is dead and that Hamlet is
the killer, she loses her mind and drowns herself in the stream.  Hamlet not being
truthful with her from the start could be considered a cause of her death, and he is
somewhat responsible for losing her.

How is the more formal nature of a draft different from the more informal nature of pre-writing?

As students put down their ideas in the pre-writing stage,
they are mainly concerned with the recording of these ideas upon paper before they lose
them.  There is little attention given to the organization of these ideas, the structure
of the sentences, spelling, punctuation,etc.  However, when students prepare for the
execution of a first draft, they organize ideas into a thesis statement, arranging their
subtopics by importance or emphasis. In addition, they select the types of support that
they wish to use with these ideas.


Dependent upon what the
assignment is, of course, is the arrangement and style of students' essays or papers. 
For instance, if a student writes a persuasive essay, there are outlines and standards
to which the essay must adhere.  Or, if a student analyzes a literary work there is
another method used.  For help, see the sites below.

Who can tell me the multiculturalism in the Joy Luck Club?Please tell it in specific way!

There is much from which to choose.  On one hand, I think
that the discussion of culture from the point of view of the mother and the daughters is
extremely important.  This is something that allows the reader to see multicultural
values discussed and highlighted through both points of view.  I would also suggest that
seeing how the American daughters view their Chinese mothers is another example of
multiculturalism being present.  In this light, one sees how the modern definition and
parameters of culture are applied to a traditional one.  The idea in multiculturalism is
to examine and observe the presence of difference in cultural perception.  We see this
in Tan's work through the discussion of both sets of values.  Finally, I would also
suggest that mutliculturalism examines how different notions of identity play out in the
lives of the individual.  Race and ethnicity are a part of this, but how race and
ethnicity impact gender and other considerations can also fit in the definition of
multiculturalism.  In this light, Tan's work is representative because it seeks to
assess what it means to be a woman in both Chinese culture and the Chinese- American
notion of cultural identity.

In A Streetcar Named Desire, what causes Blanche's distortion of reality?

Additionally,


Blanche went
spiraling down when three major life-changing events came almost one after another,
leaving her in limbo without knowing how or why it all
happened.


The first was discovering her husband (whom she
loved immensely) in bed with another man. Blanche could not bear it, and undestandably
so. She thought she could shrug it off and move on- but she
couldn't.


The second was her husband's sucicide. Given that
Blanche was unable to shake off what she saw, she went out with the men (her husband and
her lover) and, in a daze of alcohol she exploded. She told him "You make me sick", and
this prompted his shooting himself. She carried that throughout the play, whenever the
lights hit, and the music begins.


The third was the loss of
Belle Reeve. No matter what anyone says, money CAN provide some comfort from stress and
pain. She lost that too. When her father began to get sick already Stella had gone off
to marry, and it was Blanche who stayed behind letting it all go and not knowing how to
fix it.


All these things happened in a way that nobody saw
coming. Blanche was not psychologically nor socially prepared to handle the situations.
Her world, as she knew it, was removed from under her feet, and she became numb- only
that, instead of moving above and beyond the problem, she succumbed to her inner demons:
alcohol, sex, and debauchery.


Blanche is the epitome of the
broken woman: One whose situation is so desperate that her former self dies and a new
one has to be made up from the shambles in which she fell.

How did the two main British settlements in North America—New England and the Chesapeake—differ from one another? How were they...

The early settlers in Plymouth and the rest of New England
came predominantly for religious freedom, while many of the early settlers in Chesapeak
Bay area and Jamestown area came for riches. The settlers in Plymouth wrote the Plymouth
Compact, an agreement on how they would govern themselves, while the settlers in the
south had their rules dictated by England and were not self-governed. One of the men who
traveled on the Mayflower, Stephen Hopkins, had previously lived in Jamestown. He was
the only passenger aboard the Mayflower who had been to North America previously. He was
very involved in building relationships with the Native Americans in Plymouth.  In New
England, the Native Americans and the settlers co-existed predominantly peacefully for
fifty years. In Jamestown their wer lots of conflicts and fighting between the settlers
and the Native Americans. In Jamestown, the settlers began growing tobacco and indigo
and were more dependent on agriculture. In Plymouth, the colonists were predominantly
subsistence farmers and fished, cut lumber, and shipped these and furs to
England.

What are literature similarities between Beowulf and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight?

The classic literature pieces Beowulf
and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight were written centuries apart,
but have many similarities.  Both include tragic heroes with tragic flaws – pride or
hubris in this case.  The main characters’ journeys lead them each to learn much about
themselves.  Both include elements of bildungsroman, or a coming of age story as they
both deal with young warriors proving themselves as they grow up throughout the course
of the text.  Also, both titles include monsters that must be conquered, both physical
monsters and mental/ emotional monsters.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

What are some examples of literary elements (conflict, theme, etc.) in Wuthering Heights?

Wuthering Heights blends the genres
of Romanticism, Naturalism,
and Realism together to achieve a balance between the
three.  The novel is rich in Romantic imagery and
characterization: nature as good, Heathcliff as a Byronic hero, mystery and ghosts,
unbridled passion, and consequences of unrequited love
(revenge).


The novel also deals with the
Naturalistic/Realistic themes of social class barriers, gender differences, and
geography.  The narration of Nelly seems very realistic, as
it is modest, plain-spoken, and objective.  Though, we often doubt her motivations (is
she in love with Heathcliff or not?).


The novel is a great
example of doubling, doppelgangers,
foils, and dualities.  It is two novels in one.  It has two narrators, two Catherines,
two Heathcliffs (hero and villain), and two settings (Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross
Grange).  And a lot of rabid dogs.  In this way, it is a forerunner for the Gothic
psychological horror tales.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Why are Ulrich and Georg feuding ?

The reason that these two men hate each other goes back
pretty far in time.  It goes back to the time when the grandfathers of the two men were
in control of the lands that Ulrich and Georg now control.  It seems that von Gradwitz's
grandfather managed to use the courts to get this land away from Znaeym's
grandfather.


Here is a quote that shows
this:



A
famous law suit, in the days of his grandfather, had wrested it from the illegal
possession of a neighbouring family of petty landowners; the dispossessed party had
never acquiesced in the judgment of the Courts, and a long series of poaching affrays
and similar scandals had embittered the relationships between the families for three
generations.



Because of this
ancient feud, the two men hate each other.  This is why they are out patrolling on the
night that the storm hits.  Therefore, it is that old lawsuit that is going to (it
seems) get them both killed.

Where do I find information on the following question: Should tradition be followed blindly?

Nothing should be followed blindly. Taking the literal
meaning of the phrase, even blind people use means other than sight to reduce the
problems of acting blindly.


Tradition is a useful starting
point for guiding current action. Tradition represents what has been found to be
consistently right and useful in the past and, therefor, has been adopted by many people
as a standard practice. But times change and, with that, requirements change. As a
result, traditions can and do become outdated. It is important to note that traditions
are not static. These do change with the changing times. Only problems is that average
people, often lack either the intelligence to see the need for change, or the courage to
take risk of venturing in the uncharted waters of breaking
traditions.


Also there may be situations where traditions
are still useful in general, but exceptions to tradition is justified because of some
special circumstances or requirements. When we act blindly we fail to see the signs
pointing to the need for changing the traditions or deviating from
them.

How does the play The Crucible show the conflict of the individual vs society?

You have identified a major theme of this excellent play.
Clearly the conflict between the security of the community and individual freedom runs
throughout the play. Salem was a community which felt under demonic siege, threatened by
the dangers of the wilderness, the possible corrupting influences of other Christian
sects, and a genuine fear of the devil. The play also has obvious parallels with the
McCarthy investigations, which were proceeding when it was first
produced.


One way of viewing the play is as an allegory of
the abuse of state power by those who persecuted and denounced people who were thought
to be undermining the American way of life. Just as in Salem, any who opposed McCarthy's
investigations were treated as enemies of the
state.


Against the Machiavellian manoeuvres of people in
the play like the Putnams, who deliberately sweep up a crowd frenzy for their own
purposes, it is the place of the few to stand up against the madness of their society
and maintain the truth. Unfortunately, in the play, this normally brings a sad fate upon
these characters. The best examples, and ones you will want to investigate further, are
Rebecca Nurse, Elizabeth Proctor, Giles Corey and, at the end, John Proctor, who only
finds peace when he paradoxically goes to his death.

Can somebody give me steps on how to go about doing formula rearrangement? (algebra)

As a general guideline, I would cluster the variables and
numbers into "terms" by following rules of the four
operations.


Manipulation of variables, making a variable
the subject, is a matter of systematically carrying out a series of negating operations
on both sides of the equation, again obeying rules of the four
operations.


Will require you to supply examples, questions
on Algebra which you stumble upon, so that I can demonstrate what I meant in the
preceding two paragraphs.

The United Nations proposed to divide Palestine into how many states and who was to inhabit the states?

In November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly
voted to divide Palestine into two states--Jewish and Arab--with the Jerusalem area
(including Bethlehem) to be controlled by an international governing body. The final
vote of the U. N. General Assembly was 33-13 (with 10 abstentions). Jewish leaders
accepted the plan, but it was denounced by virtually the entire Arab world, including
all independent Arab and Muslim nations. Civil war broke out almost immediately. Six
months later, the Jewish state declared itself the independent nation of Israel.
Meanwhile, the Arab nations of Syria, Egypt and Iraq attacked Israeli forces, primarily
in the Jerusalem area. A truce was announced a month later, during which time Israel
expanded its army and gained control of surrounding areas.

Monday, September 16, 2013

WHAT IS THE COXSACKIE VIRUS?

DEFINITION


Infections
caused by viruses of the Coxsackie group are characterized by a wide variety of clinical
symptoms as: acute respiratory diseases, herpangina, myalgia, myocarditis, pericarditis,
nephritis, meningitis, encephalitis, paralytic disease, febrile illness accompanied by
exanthema
etc..


ETIOLOGY


 Coxackie
viruses belong to the enterovirus family and they are divided into two
subgroups:


- A, with 23 serotypes, cause an experimental
disease, with large lesions of myositis, with muscles
paralysis;


- B, with six serotypes, causes muscles damages,
degenerative lesions of the CNS, myocardium, endocardium,
pancreas.


EPIDEMIOLOGY
PROCESS


It is evolving most commonly in children but also
adult, with summer-autumn  seasonality. It can occur as nosocomial
infections.


Epidemiological
Key Factors


Source of infection is
the human, who may be sick, inaparent infected (50-80% of cases) or a healthy carrier
(the virus is transferred through faeces or naso-pharyngeal
secretions).


Epidemiological Secondary
Factors


- Poor hygiene
conditions


-
Communities


Prevention and
Control


There is no specific prophylaxis
(vaccine).


It is recommended to avoid the contact of
newborns with ill suspects.


In the epidemic case is
recommended to avoid crowds or  to swim in dirty pools.

In what ways do Hrothgar, Wiglaf and Beowulf's men live up to or fail to live up to the image of the epic hero?

In Beowulf, Wiglaf does embody many
of the epic hero qualities, as my colleague documents so well.  Beowulf's men are
also good examples of epic heroes.  Hrothgar, not as
much.


When Beowulf was preparing to go fight Grendel, he
chose his men carefully.  They were under no obligation to go with Beowulf, as this
was his battle, not theirs.  They were honorable and respectful and brave once the
battle with Grendel began.  Despite the fact that Beowulf wanted to battle alone, in
hand-to-hand combat, his men attempted to fight on his behalf.  Their efforts were
ineffectual, of course, since Grendel had cast a spell to protect himself from their
weapons.  But they were there and prepared to fight.  Later, when Beowulf followed
Grendel's mother to her ocean lair, his men kept vigil on the shore for their leader. 
They were unwilling to assume he would not prevail in this battle.  These warriors did,
indeed, exhibit the same qualities as their heroic
leader.


Hrothgar, on the other hand, could not be
considered an epic hero.  He hadgiven up the battle against Grendel, allowing him to
wander his lands and kill at his leisure and pleasure.  While he may once have exhibited
the kind of valor and bravery needed to be called an epic hero, those days are gone. 
Instead, Hrothgar is now simply waiting hopefully for someone to come to their rescue. 
Beowulf does so, and that's when Hrothgar shines.  He is a welcoming host, treating
Beowulf and his men as honored guests.  Once Beowulf has completed his tasks, Hrothgar
is true to his word and bestows praise and lavish gifts on him.  To that degree, he's
more of an epic host than an epic hero.

Napoleon and Snowball had differing opinons concerning defense in Animal Farm. Explain how each leader felt the farm should be protected.

I agree.  Napoleon clearly advocated the use of force in
any confrontation in order to keep the farm.  Snowball, on the other hand, was a bit
more of a diplomat.  He studied Roman war theory and wanted to create a worldwide power
grab in order to place every farm on equal footing.  If all had what Animal Farm had, he
figured, there would be no need for fighting.  Ironically, when the attack does come,
Napoleon is in hiding while Snowball leads the charge.  Napoleon does end up using force
to keep the farm; but, ironically, he uses it against his fellow
animals.

h(x) =( 5-x)/the square root of 5x-125what is largest possible domain

To find the largest domain of h(x) =
(5-x)/sqrt(5x-125)


The lthe domain of h(x) =
(5-x)/sqrt(5x-125) is the set of all x for which h(x) is defined and
real.


The expression (5-x)/ sqrt(5x-125) has the
denominator sqrt(5x-125).


When 5x-125 = 0,   x = 125/5 =
25.


So the expresion (5-x)/sqrt(5x-125) becomes (5-25)/0
which is not defined.


So x = 25  cannot be in the
domain.....(1)


Also sqrt(5x-125) is not real when 5x
< 125. Or x < 125/5 = 25.


Therefore the
domain cannot take vaues x < 25. (2)


So combining
the (1) and (2) , we see that the domain  of  h(x) = (5-x)/sqrt(5x-125) is x >
25. Or  the domain of x  is  (25 , infinity) wher 25 is not
included.

In To Kill a Mockingbird, why is Tom's left arm crippled?

We first see Tom Robinson's arm at the trial after Heck
Tate, Mayella and Bob have all testified. The information they reveal contrasts against
Tom's testimony in many ways, but the first is the physical description of injuries and
the cold hard truth that your question begs to reveal. The person who injured Mayella
appears to have been able to lead strongly with their left
arm.


Tom's left arm got caught in a cotton
gin while he was at work on Mr. Link Deas' farm. 


Another detail that deals with this
arm occurs Mr. Gilmer's suggestion that Tom was a good fighter anyway and could have
done to Mayella what he did even though he is crippled. That argument was disproved by
Atticus.


Link Deas also stands up to testify (although he
wasn't asked) on behalf of Robinson from the middle of the courtroom. He insinuated that
Tom had always been a good worker for him.

Why would a person taking a diuretic need to take potassium?

A diuretic is basically a drug that increases the rate of
urination. As a person urinates more there is a loss of bodily salts with urine.
Different compounds which are expelled with urine have a function to play in the
transmission of signals from the brain, action of muscles and many other functions in
the body. The decrease of any compound could adversely affect the processes in the body,
like breathing, beating of the heart and others.


This is
the reason why a person taking a diuretic has to take more potassium. So that processes
which require potassium are not affected.


Though, this is
not the case always, there are many different types of diuretics and each has a
different effect on the rate of substances expelled from the body, for examples
Aldosterone antagonists and Epithelial sodium channel blockers decrease the secretion of
potassium with urine. If these are used, it may not be necessary to take
potassium.

What kind of book are you going to select? Summer time. Schools are closed. You are a 5th grade ELA teacher. Local public library gives you a...

I would have to go with #3 in that list of selections. 
The idea being, both with ELA learners and their parents (usually also limited English
speakers) is to increase their understanding of the language and vocabulary and to give
them a love of reading.


Too often I think we view our jobs
as teachers as giving stduents everything they need to learn before they leave in the
12th grade.  It's a rather silly proposition.  Everyone continues to learn, what we are
is the survey course.  Sure, we can give them math and comprehension skills, but the
desire to learn on their own, plus their interest in our subjects, is at least as
important to their future intellectual growth.

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Why do you think Orwell has Snowball make mistakes in his writing?

I assume that you are referring to how Orwell says that
Snowball cannot quite write the letters properly when he writes the commandments up on
the wall (towards the end of Chapter 2).  In my opinion, Orwell does this to show that
Snowball and the other pigs are still inexperienced and are not as "polished" as the
human beings.


I think that Orwell is trying to point out
that the animals are trying to set their system up from scratch.  They are going to face
obstacles because they do not really know how to govern.  In fact, even the best of them
cannot write 100% correctly.  If this is the case, you would think that they are sure to
have some problems as they set up their system.


Revolutions
tend to be run by people who have not governed.  This means that they do not really know
how to run a government.  That may be one reason why revolutions often go bad.  I think
this is what Orwell is trying to get across by having Snowball make those two mistakes
in writing.

Which Characters in The Great Gatsby fit the description of stock, dynamic, and round?

Concerning the types of characters in The Great
Gatsby
, I think that maybe no editors have answered your question yet,
because two of the three terms you ask about don't really apply to the novel.  I didn't
answer it the first time I saw it, either--I was hoping someone else might have a
complete answer for you, because I only have a partial
one.


In other words, I'm not sure any stock or dynamic
characters are really featured in the novel.  Characters are well-developed (the "round"
part of your question), but no often-used, stereotypical stock characters really exist,
and I don't know that anyone really changes much (dynamic).  Wilson is the possible
exception, with his murder of Gatsby and suicide, but he certainly isn't a major
character.


Even Gatsby, the most well-developed and
definitely round character, doesn't change.  That's what makes him Gatsby.  His love is
an idealistic, all-encompassing love, and he never gives up on his chance to get Daisy
back and recapture his past.  He's still waiting for a call from Daisy on the last
morning of his life.  He never comes to a realization or epiphany of any
kind. 


Gatsby is round, though.  He is a mystery man who is
shy, he's almost always polite yet seemingly uncaring about anything that doesn't
concern his quest to get Daisy back, has a library full of books but doesn't read them,
loves, perhaps, like everyone wishes he/she could love, was born fairly poor but becomes
extremely wealthy, makes his money illegally, at least in part, and yet is an obsessive
idealist. 


Daisy, too, is a round character.  She's a
victim of her patriarchal society, cynical, difficult to "read" or interpret,
manipulative, beautiful and knows how to use her beauty to get what she wants, and is at
least somewhat amoral.  Yet, though she despises Tom and may actually love Gatsby, she
refuses to say something that isn't true--that she never loved Tom, even when they were
newly married.  She rejects Gatsby, in the end, because she won't say what isn't true,
because Gatsby asks too much:  he insists that his dream is true, that Daisy's been
pining for him these five years, and never really loved Tom.  And Daisy won't say
it. 


Gatsby and Daisy are certainly round characters, but,
again, I just don't think the other two types of characters you ask about apply to this
novel. 

1. Explain how the action of an inhibitory neurotransmitter might affect this synapse. 2. In certain diseases, the motor neurons are progressively...

1.


An inhibitory
neurotransmitter will not bind to the ligand-gated ion channels in the post-synaptic
membrane.  The effect would be that the following neuron or muscle cell woud not be
activated and therefore the action potential would stop at the pre-synaptic membrane.
 


2. 


If a motor neuron is
damaged (e.g. the resting membrane potential is disrupted) then either the membrane
potential would polarize even more and the threshold of the voltage-gated ion channels
would not be easily reached, causing the inability to move muscles, muscle paralysis.
 If the resting potential was too high, residing over the threshold, there would be
uncontrolled action potentials pulsing from the motor nueron and the muscle cells would
uncontrollably contract.  A less severe effect is that it would be easier to fire off an
action potential if the resting membrane potential depolarized only a little bit and
still resided lower than the threshold.  


Source: Campbell
Biology Seventh Edition AP Edition

What is Jerry Cruncher's secret nighttime activity, and what important theme does this activity underscore in A Tale of Two Cities?

Jerry Cruncher's euphemistically-termed occupation as
"resurrection man" proves pivotal to the plot of A Tale of Two Cities
while he is still in England as he observes the funeral of Roger Cly.  For,
later, after the funeral, Jerry decides to rob the grave and discovers that the coffin
is filled with dirt and rocks.


Related to the theme of
resurrection, in Chapter 8, "A Hand at Cards," of Book the Third of
the novel, in a fantastic coincidence, Jerry and Miss Pross are shopping for groceries
and run into her brother Solomon, who is, in fact John Basard, the spy and the "Sheep of
the prison."  Then, another coincidence occurs as Sydney Carton and Mr. Lorry appear on
the scene.  Carton looks at Basard/Solomon and recognizes in Basard--"I know the
face"--the man who testified against Charles Darnay at the treason trial for the French
aristocrat.  But, this Roger Cly, whom Basard claims the witness was, Carton observes,
spoke "good French.  Yet like a foreigner."  He then
says,



"Cly! 
Disguised, but the same man.  We had that man before us at the Old
Bailey."



Now Carton has
"cards" to play against Basard, the jailor at the prison.  But, Basard contends that
Cly, who was his partner, has been buried in London.  It is here that Jerry interjects
his knowledge that Cly was never truly buried, revealing that the coffin was empty. 
This gives Carton the edge that he needs, the cards to play, to control John Basard. 
Thus, he is able to have Basard, who fears his exposure to the revolutionaries, let him
into Darnay's cell so that he can switch places, resurrecting Darnay from prison as his
father-in-law was also resurrected, and thereby providing Carton a spiritual
resurrection as he becomes the sacrificial victim for Charles
Darnay.

What are some allusions and their significance in the second half of The Awakening?

There is evidence of at least two possible allusions in
the second part of Kate Chopin's novel, The
Awakening
.


In Chapter 28 –
“…comprehend the significance of life, that monster made up of beauty and
brutality”
– This might be an allusion to Frankenstein,
written by Mary Shelley and printed anonymously in 1818.  This may have been an image
familiar to Chopin when she was writing this story in 1898 (especially in that the
author of the famous novel was also a woman).  Victor Frankenstein experienced the
“significance of life” when he finally brought life to the creature.  Creation was the
“beauty,” but the reality of what he had done (acting like God to create life), as well
as the monster’s violent murders, would refer to the “brutality” which accompanied
Victor’s “accomplishment.”


In Chapter 39 – “Venus
rising from the foam could have presented no more entrancing a spectacle than Mrs.
Pontellier, blazing with beauty and diamonds at the head of the board…”

This is, of course, an allusion to Botticelli’s famous painting entitled, “The Birth of
Venus,” the Roman goddess of beauty and love.


While the
second allusion seems very obvious, and the first perhaps more unfathomable, remember
that "art" speaks to everyone differently.  There is no way to be sure that Chopin was
or was not using this as a literary allusion.  An allusion takes on significance based
upon the knowledge and experience of the person interacting with that piece of
art.


Certainly, this is seen with Shakespeare's great
works, where scholars debate the meaning of a line, a character's purpose, or an entire
play, without ever knowing who, if anyone, has the accurate
interpretation.

What sort of relationship do Ko and Yoko have in So Far from the Bamboo Grove?Yoko refers to Ko as "Honorable Sister." Sometimes they exchange...

The term "Honorable Sister" is most probably a translation
of the word "One-esan," which is a common term used by children to address their older
sisters. Although the word does have an inherent element of respect associated with it,
it is not quite as stilted an address as it might sound in direct translation, in
English.


Yoko and Ko have a very normal sisterly
relationship. Ko is looked up to by Yoko because she is older, and it is true that Ko is
dependable, and a great help to her mother in many ways, including looking out for her
little sister. Ko is not perfect, however, and, like any normal teenager, is subject to
moodiness on occasion, and is sometimes frustrated by her little sister Yoko's behavior,
especially considering the stress the family is under as they struggle to escape to
safety during the War. Ko can be bossy and cross when she is annoyed. Yoko, on her part,
looks up to her big sister, but clashes with her at times as well. Yoko is eleven years
old, but as the youngest child she can be a little spoiled. Throughout the ordeal
described in the course of the narrative, she grows up, and begins to look at things
from a more mature perspective. The clashes between Yoko and Ko diminish, as Yoko is
able to see things from Ko's point of view, and appreciate the difficulties that she is
facing as well, as the older sister and one responsible.

Comment on the setting and character of &quot;The Fall of the House of Usher.&quot;How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...