Friday, August 8, 2014

Are the three hermits in Leo Tolstoy's "The Three Hermits" supernatural beings?

In order to answer the question of whether or not the
three hermits in Tolstoy's "The Three Hermits" are supernatural beings, it is necessary
to do a textual analysis: look to and examine the words in the text to determine if
Tolstoy has provided any indicators of the answer. One such indicator would lie in the
sailor's description of the hermits. Another would lie in the Bishop's encounter with
the hermits. A third indicator would lie in the final events of the story, which Tolstoy
attributes to "An old legend current in the Volga
District."


The first indicator, the sailor's description,
gives a very physical account of the three old men who are hermits living "for the
salvation of their souls." Firstly, they live in an earthen hut; have food and water to
drink, which they share with the sailor relaying his experience; they are strong and
able and help him mend his boat. Secondly, the eldest and smallest, who has a bent back,
wears a priest's cassock and has such an ancient beard that it is discoloring. The
strongest wears a peasant's coat and has a broad yellowish beard and needed no help
turning the sailor's boat over. The stern one has a snow white beard hanging to his
knees and wears only a loin covering made of matting from leaves. These are very
concrete, very human qualities; the discoloring beards may even suggest mineral
deficiencies. There is nothing that Tolstoy has provided in the sailor's description to
suggest these are supernatural beings.


The second indicator
is the Bishop's encounter with the hermits. Aside from confirming the sailor's
description of the three men, the Bishop's encounter offers no new descriptive
information except to say that the hermits bowed low and lower to the Bishop indicating
that they are well versed in the ways of Russian society and must have lived long within
it before secluding themselves. Otherwise, the Bishop's sole attention is set on
teaching them to "pray aright," which suggests that the Bishop's impression of them is
that they are not spiritual men, which is a status that pretty much excludes being
supernatural beings. So far, Tolstoy has given no information to suggest he is
developing in the reader a perception of these hermits being anything other than human
beings.


The third indicator comes at the end of the story
when the hermits, having forgotten the Bishop's ritualized lessons, come hurrying across
the water to beg the Bishop to teach them again. This certainly might--and does--raise
the question and possibility of the hermits being supernatural beings, since it is
rather uncommon for humans to walk on water ... . But before deciding that Tolstoy has
been misrepresenting the hermits thus far, examine the Bishop's reaction, which is
significant for what he does and what he does not
do.


Firstly, the Bishop does recognize their holiness and
superiority to him: He enjoins them to leave what he taught them forgotten and to pray
"for us sinners." Grammatically, the use of "us" means that the Bishop is absolutely
including himself. What he does not do is react to the hermits as to supernatural
beings. He absolutely reacts to them as human beings, as made of the same stuff as
himself. His humility before them stems from the realization that, being men like
himself, they have a pure spirituality. And this is Tolstoy's point: Spirituality in
human beings derives from within, not from without through empty
ritual.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...