Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Compare Scout and Jem's opinions of the length of the jury deliberations in To Kill a Mockingbird.

Oddly, it is Scout who is more discerning of the truth
when the jury deliberates for many hours. As Scout struggles to stay awake, an
"impression" creeps into her. She says,


readability="11">

"The feeling grew until the atmosphere in the
courtroom was exactly the same as a cold February morning, when the mockingbirds were
still, and the carpenters had stopped hammering on Miss Maudie's new house, and every
wood door in the neighborhood was shut as tight as the doors of the Radley
Place."



Scout gets a feeling
of ominousness, sensing that something bad is happening. Her suspicions are confirmed
when the jury comes back in, and not one of its members looks directly at Tom Robinson.
As "a lawyer's child," Scout knows that "a jury never looks at a defendant it has
convicted." Despite the evidence, the jurors have found Tom Robinson
guilty.


Jem, on the other hand, has been ecstatic since the
lawyers finished their closing arguments. In his mind, the evidence is so clear, that he
cannot fathom how Tom Robinson can be found anything but innocent. He at first thinks
the jury deliberations should be over in just a few minutes, because as far as he is
concerned, there is nothing to debate, but even when the deliberations drag on for
hours, his optimism is not tempered. When Scout asks him, "Ain't it a long time?", he
answers "happily...'Sure is, Scout.'" When she points out that he had intimated that it
should "just take five minutes," he responds with unshakable faith in a positive
outcome, "there are things you don't understand" (Chapter 21).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...