Saturday, August 31, 2013

Give three examples from our daily life to show how important it is for gases to diffuse quickly.

Diffusion is the process by which molecules of a gas move
from a more concentrated state to a less concentrated state because they are constantly
in motion.  All gases are constantly in motion and this is the basis of the kinetic
molecular theory.  You may experience this when someone standing near you uses perfume
or a spray cologne and you quickly detect the odor of the
perfume.


Three examples that come to mind are first the
detection of leaks of natural gas when you smell the odorant that is added to natural
gas. Natural gas has no odor of its own  and so a strongly smelling sulfur compound is
added.  This way if a leak occurs it can be quickly detected and fixed, minimizing the
possibility of an explosion.


A second example would be the
release of oxygen from plants during photosynthesis.  This oxygen is necessary for all
animal life on earth and if it did not quickly diffuse some areas of the world would
have high levels of oxygen while other areas (such as deserts) would have almost
none.


A third example is the exhaust from automobiles. This
exhaust contains, along with carbon dioxide and water, many other compounds, some of
which are harmful and even potentially fatal, to people. Because of diffusion, the gases
in the exhaust quickly mix with the surrounding air and drop to levels that are no
longer dangerous to us.

Can a person live without a thyroid?

Thyroidectomy is relatively common, the most common reason
for removal is a malignant tumor of the gland. In some cases thyrotoxic crisis or
thyroid storm may necessitate thyroidectomy. Thyroid storm is a life threatening illness
and is characterized by tachycardia, severe hypertension, heart failure, and cardiac
dysrhythmias. Yes, you can live just fine if the thyroid gland is removed but you will
have to take thyroid medication for the rest of your
life.


The thyroid gland is an endocrine gland that secretes
the thyroid hormones thyroxine (T4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH, released by the
by the pituitary), and triiodothyronine (T3), directly into the bloodstream. These
hormones working together control the process and rate of cellular metabolism. In
children they are responsible for growth.

What is the dramatic importance of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern,the Players,and the Grave-diggers in William Shakespeare's Hamlet?

There is much in the plot of Hamlet
that highlights proper behaviour for one's station in life, especially if you are of the
royal family.  Gertrude and Claudius chastise Hamlet for his very un-correct display of
grief in the very public Act I, scene ii and Polonius not only lectures Laertes about
proper behaviour, but has him spied on to ensure that he is behaving as a man of his
position should.


So, one of the importances of R&G
is to demonstrate the "proper" way Hamlet should be behaving.  We
can assume that they are very close in age and station to Hamlet, and they do whatever
the king says, even strong-arming Hamlet out of Denmark as a part of a plot to end his
life. All in allegiance to their king.  Acting out of blind allegiance is the last thing
Hamlet would do.


As for the players, part of their purpose
is to highlight Hamlet's inability to act on his feelings.  When he comments that one
player is able to create (from his imagination) all the proper behaviour for
nothing,



For
Hecuba!


What's Hecuba to him or he to
her


That he should weep for her?  What would he
do


Had he the motive and the cue for
passion


That I have?...


Yet
I,


A dull and muddy-mettled rascal,
peak


Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my
cause


And can say
nothing.



he calls attention
to his own inability to act.  So, Hamlet is being shown up by a player, whose apparent
ability to act and follow through on his emotional impulses is all for something
made-up, while Hamlet, with a real and important call to action can do
nothing.


And finally, the Gravediggers are also in the play
to provide a dramatic passage of time and to re-introduce Hamlet to the audience, who
has been absent from the play for a few scenes.  Time has passed, and the clowns help
show that to the audience by answering Hamlet's questions at Ophelia's
grave.

Friday, August 30, 2013

In Chapter 4 Lord Henry expresses his opinion of women, what comment does he make that unintentionally says something about Dorian's masculinity?

Harry said many different things to Dorian in that chapter
because this was the chapter when Dorian told him about his new love affair with the
actress Sybil Vane, with whom Dorian fell madly in love for her portrayals of
Shakespeare characters. However, the only one quote that I could think of was when Lord
Henry (Harry) laughs at Dorian when he said that Sybil was "the love of his life". In a
surreptitious way, Lord Henry answered while he
laughed:



"I
am not laughing, Dorian; at least I am not laughing at you. But you should not say the
greatest romance of your life. You should say the first romance of your life. You will
always be loved, and you will always be in love with love. A grande passion is the
privilege of people who have nothing to do. That is the one use of the idle classes of a
country. Don't be afraid. There are exquisite things in store for you. This is merely
the beginning."



This was a
clear sexual innuendo like Wilde fills basically all his stories with, to insinuate that
Dorian is just going through a period before finding out his true
sexuality.

What kind of strategies does Dylan Thomas employ to affect the reader in his poem "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night"?I am writing an essay...

As you state in your question, Dylan Thomas, in his poem
"Do Not Go Gently Into that Good Night," rejects the convential passive approach to
death.


One of the ways that Thomas emphasizes this point is
both extremely simple and extremely effective: he repeats it, in identical words,
numerous times.  Each stanza of the poem contains either the phrase "Do not go gentle
into that good night," or "Rage, rage against the dying of that good night."  This
simple technique of repetition--known as anaphora--helps Thomas to hammer home his point
in memorable fashion.


Thomas expresses one of your other
points--that people should live their lives to the fullest--through the use of several
striking images.  There are:


readability="9">

"Wise men...[whose] words had forked no
lightning";


"Good men...[whose} deeds might have danced in
a green bay";


"Grave men...[whose] eyes could blaze like
meteors."



These images are
much more interesting and memorable than simply saying, "Live life to the
fullest."


Your other point,  that emotionality is part of
our humanity, is--of course--a major theme of the poem.


The
poem is about people who, logically speaking, have nothing more to live for.  They have
arrived at "old age," "at [the] close of day"; they are "at their end"; they are "near
death."


Yet, the poet urges them to "Rage, rage against the
dying of the light."  He does not mean that they should seek some miracle treatment for
their ailments.  Rather, he is urging them to react to death with a vigorous emotion of
rebellion.

In The Road, there are cannibals, looters, and pilgrims. Who are the pilgrims?Infer characteristics of them from the text of the story. Are the...

In Cormac McCarthy's The Road, the
man and the boy are pilgrims carrying the fire.  The family that the boy meets in the
end is also made of pilgrims carrying the fire.  On this God-forsaken road in
post-Apacolyptic America, it seems that the nuclear family is fire in and of itself.
 These lone families are pilgrims not only in a quest for their own basic survival, but
for the future generations of humanity.  Without them, humankind is surely
doomed.


The man and the boy's first pilgrimage is to get to
the ocean, presumably because they think it will be a better climate for survival.  When
the father reaches the sea, he is disappointed to learn that the pilgrimage was in vain:
the ocean is no better than the mainland.


His ulterior
motive in this pilgrimage is to deliver the boy to a new father or family before he
dies.  But, the man does not trust anyone.  He even tells the boy to kill himself rather
than be taken alive by a looter or cannibal.  This pilgrimage is based on faith, and the
father clearly does have any faith left in others.  So, it's another pilgrimage in
vain.


His ultimate hope is for the boy to make his own
pilgrimage.  After the father dies, the boy indeed goes back onto the road and lets
himself be found by the man with the shotgun.  If his father were still alive, it's
doubtful the boy would have done this (his father would have hidden or run).  So, it is
the boy's pilgrimage back onto the road at the end--one that could have doomed him--that
is the greatest pilgrimage of all.  The boys restores his faith in humanity, and the
fire keeps a-goin'.

What's another name for mesosphere? What does it do?

There are four semi-horizontal layers of “spheres” that
are identified by their vertical temperature distribution in the Earth’s atmosphere. 
These four layers are called the troposphere, the stratosphere, the
mesosphere, also called the “mantle
” and the thermosphere.  Between these
layers are spaces called “pauses”; no temperature change happens when the altitude
changes. Each of these pauses has a specific name.  The tropopause occurs between the
troposphere and the stratosphere.  The stratopause is found between the mesosphere and
the thermosphere. Together, the stratosphere and the mesosphere are called the middle
atmosphere. This region overlaps with the ionosphere. The ionosphere is define on the
electric charges of the particles found within it.


“Meso”
means middle in Greek.  The mesosphere, then, means the middle of the sphere. The
mesosphere is the third layer of the Earth’s atmosphere
It is found between the stratosphere and the thermosphere and is located about 35 miles
(55 kilometers) to around 54 miles (85 kilometers) from the surface of the Earth.  The
mesosphere’s temperatures are dependent on where you are measuring. At its lowest level,
it is the warmest, about 23°F (°C); at its highest, 12°F (0°C).  However, depending on
the season and latitude, the uppermost portion can drop to 20°F
(40°C). 


Mesospheric temperatures are lower than
temperatures in the troposphere or stratosphere. It is so cold that even Antarctica’s
coldest temperature are higher; it is so cold that water vapor becomes ice clouds,
sometimes visible after sunset.


The air in the mesosphere
is very thin and the atmospheric pressure is low; there is a much lower concentration of
oxygen in the mesosphere than the troposphere; there are only insignificant amounts of
ozone and water vapor. The mesosphere is where many meteors burn
up
as they enter the Earth’s atmosphere and collide with other gas
particles within
it. 


Source: World
of Earth Science, ©2003 Gale Cengage. All Rights
Reserved

Thursday, August 29, 2013

In Saint-Exupery's The Little Prince, what are two main lessons that the prince learns, and who does he learn them from?

One of the most important
lessons
is learned through the fox. It can
be said that through the fox the prince learns the value of
faithfulness
. The prince has wandered far from his own planet and from
the rose, the one he loves, because he felt she had rejected him. In contrast, the fox
teaches him that when one "tames" something, that something becomes extra special. When
one tames something, one needs that something and that something needs you in return. As
the fox explains, if the prince tamed him then they would be unique to each other in all
the world and need each other. In addition, the fox explains that if the prince tamed
him the fox's life would have meaning and that things that were of no use to him now
would suddenly be of use, such as the wheat fields. The wheat fields are the same color
of the prince's hair and so looking at the wheat fields would remind the fox of the
prince. In short, the fox teaches the prince that his flower has tamed
him
. But more importantly, when the prince decides it is time to leave
the fox, the fox teaches the prince that he is responsible for what he
tames
; he is therefore responsible for his
rose
, as we see in the fox's lines, "It is the time you have wasted for
your rose that makes your rose so important ... You become responsible, forever, for
what you have tamed. You are responsible for your rose ..." (Ch. 21). It is due to the
fox's wisdom that the prince realizes he must return home
to continue caring for his rose.

The
snake
also teaches him a very valuable lesson. Meeting the snake is the
first time that the prince begins to see the value of reconnecting with
his roots
, as we see in the snake's line, "Whomever I touch, I send back
to the earth from whence he came" (Ch. 17). In addition, he learns the
value of the spiritual world rather than the corporeal
world, something he also learns from the fox who teaches him that it is the things that
can't be seen that are important. It is because of his knowledge of the value of things
unseen that the prince becomes brave enough to leave his body behind in order to return
to his flower.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

In Heartburn, how does Rachel use cooking as a way of interacting with Mark in her life? What does she achieve with it?

Rachel uses cooking as a way to communicate feelings and
emotions that she lacks the vocabulary to express.  In Rachel’s mind, food and love are
extremely similar and she substitutes one for the other in communication.  The hope that
she holds is that Mark will understand the meaning of such expression.  It is apparent
that he doesn’t.  When she cooks pasta and shares it with him in bed, it is a seminal
moment.  Notice how she places primacy on such an action.  It is an instant where there
is communication.  Rachel may very well lack the emotional language to say, “I love you”
or “I need you.”  However, she finds those elements of communication present in her
cooking and the expression of it is vital.  At the same time, her role as a food critic
helps to bring this vocabulary into further existence, as she spends her time critiquing
others attempt to master a language that she feels very confident in expressing.  When
Mark disappoints and betrays her, it is a realization to Rachel that her method of
communicating through food is lacking.  In a larger sense, she might be fully cognizant
of the limitations of language, in general.  We can say, “I love you” to someone,
anyone.  However, such a declaration, though it might be clear in our minds, can still
yield uncertain results and usually does reveal that which is not clear.  When she seeks
to hold on to her secret vinaigrette recipe, it is a reflection of an individual broken
in a relationship, seeking to hold on to something, anything that will preserve their
dignity and power.  It’s no different than someone holding on to a figurine or a
particular book or CD after the relationship ends.  It’s a substitute for expression and
articulation.  Perhaps it is because the lexicon is lacking or because it is too
painful.  Yet, Rachel uses cooking as a way to communicate what she feels.  At the end,
she recognizes the need to supplement this with actual expression of self- desire and
concept of self in order to fully articulate her emotional
needs.

I need guidance on how to write an essay about the movie Freedom Writers, and it must contain discussion of a social issue.Here are the assignment...

Much of this is going to have to come from your own
understanding of the film and how you feel about it.  This subjective and personalized
nature of the prompt is going to prevent anyone from really being able to "write it" for
you.  I think that there are some elements upon which you can place focus.  The idea of
individuals and their social circumstance is really important in the film.  The idea of
being able to rise above one's condition and empower themselves against the overwhelming
social and economic context is probably one of the most intense elements present.  Being
able to discuss how the film showed individuals having power against dire social
conditions would be one approach to take.  If you wanted to play with this a bit more,
perhaps you could discuss how the film might actually be evading criticism of these
social structures in emphasizing how individuals hold their socio- economic realities
accountable.  In other words, the film shows that the students can "write" about their
lives and gain power over their own consciousness.  Yet, there is little in the film
that suggests that a better or more equitable distribution of wealth and resources would
help these kids out immensely.  The film does not focus on that because "you cannot
control that."  While this is true, the film might be actually apologizing and excusing
this disproportionate wealth and resource allocation by not calling for such a situation
to change.  This might be another topic about which compose thoughts, as
well.

WHY DO SOME PEOPLE HAVE TO HAVE THEIR WISDOM TEETH EXTRACTED AND SOME DO NOT?

A person's wisdom teeth need to be removed only if they
are causing complications with the rest of a person's already existing teeth, or if
there is pain.  The most common two problems are either that a person's wisdom teeth
start growing in sideways, or they do not breech the gum line.  If the teeth start
growing in sideways it can damage existing
teeth.


Essentially what most dentists believe happened is
that as the human skull evolved, and the jaw shrunk in size the wisdom teeth that used
to fit in our mouths no longer had room to grow in causing complications.  Our anatomy
did not keep up with our evolution.  Over time the human body continues to evolve, and
given enough time there will be more people without wisdom teeth than there are with
them.  Even in the present day there exist people who have no wisdom teeth to
remove.


These days it is common for most people to have
their wisdom teeth removed once they reach about 18 years of age to avoid the
possibility of complications later in life.  Even if there is room in the jaw for the
wisdom teeth to grow in, it is common for these teeth to develop infections because they
are so close to the jawline that food gets stuck there, and is difficult to remove even
with flossing (some fingers just aren't long enough!)

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

'The principle theme of Mansfield's "Miss Brill" is estrangement as human beings are fundamentally cruel and indifferent to others.' Discuss.

Interesting statement you have to discuss there. I am not
too sure that I agree with it if I am honest, because whilst the theme you identify is
definitely present in this tremendous short story, I don't actually believe that it is
the principal theme. The only example in the story we are given of humans being
fundamentally cruel to others is the young couple towards the end who insult Miss Brill,
calling her "an old mug" and describing her much-prized fur as "fried whiting." It is
this overheard conversation that of course pricks the bubble of Miss Brill's glorious
"drama" that she considers this scene to be, and forces her to confront what is a much
bigger theme by far: her own loneliness and isolation.


So,
whilst I would agree that the indifference of human beings towards others is something
that is evident in this story, because after all part of Miss Brill's elaborate fantasy
is that "somebody would have noticed if she hadn't been there," by far the main theme is
the tremendous isolation and loneliness as experienced by one female character who is
only able to live life as a spectator sport by enjoying the lives that others lead
instead of living life herself.

How many atomic wars has this society experienced? how do the people react to the wars?This question is taken from Part II the sieve and the sand

There have been two atomic wars since 1990, and it is
implied that Montag's country emerged from those wars relatively unscathed, as Montag
muses that the rest of the world hates his country for its superior position, which it
gained through cruelty and narcissism. The impact of those atomic wars on the people in
this society is not detailed, but it seems to have contributed to the society's
rejection of books and thought, and addiction to thrills that take up all the time that
might otherwise be spent in melancholy thoughts. The disasters of the previous atomic
wars and the gradual deteroriation of life overall seem to have led society to embrace
anything that would prevent it from reflection.

In Chapter 16, how do Edgar and Heathcliff react differently to news of Catherine's death?

After Catherine death the condition of Edgar and
Heathcliiff is described by Nelly,because it is Nelly who has given to Lockwood an
account of the circumstances in which Catherine died.She then goes on to give him an
account of the subsequent developments. She says that Edgar's grief over Catherine's
death was intense, and that it would be very painful to her (Nelly) to describe his
grief.The after-effects of Catherine's death on Edgar showed that the sorrow had sunk
very deep in Edgar's heart. Edgar had sat throughout the night by the dead body of his
wife,with his head laid on the pillow,and his eyes closed. His young and handsome face
had seemed to be almost as death-like as that of the dead Catherine was. There had been
the same fixity and immobility on his features as there was on the dead Catherine's
features. The only difference between them at  that time his hush and stillness were a
result of anguish and exhaustion, while Catherine's stillness and silence were a
consequence of the perfect peace which death had brought with
it.


On the other hand when Nelly had gone out of the house
to inform Heathcliff, who had been waiting outside,about Catherine's death. Heathcliff
had already come to know of the death. He had been leaning against a tree ,with his hat
off, and his hair drenched in the dew which had accumulated on the branches of the tree
and had been falling on him drop by drop . He had been standing in that position for
quite a long time. Heathcliff asked to Nelly, if Catherine had died like a saint. He
wanted a true account of the event. It was evident to Nelly that he had been holding a
silent combat with his inward agony, and that he did not need any of her sympathy. He
was trembling to his very finger-ends. Nelly felt that this man, though very strong
minded, had a heart and nerves similar to every other man's. She told him that Catherine
had died quietly as a lamb and that she had heaved a sigh and , stretching herself had
sunk to sleep. On The describing about the death of Catherine before Heathcliff she
expressed her wish that Catherine should wake up as gently in the other world as she had
died in this world, Heathcliff become almost violent and says,
" May she wake in torment !"
He said with frightful vehemence.
Stamping his foot on the ground , and groaning in a sudden fit of anger,he said that
Catherine had been a liar to the very end of her life.She was certainly not in heaven.
He had one prayer to offer; and his prayer was : Catherine
Earnshaw , may you not rest as long as I am living !"
He then
went on to say that if he had killed her as she had alleged, she should haunt him as a
ghost.His grief, he went on to say , was inexpressible.Then he declared that he could
not live without Catherine who had been his lif and his
soul.


Saying these words , Heathcliff dashed his head
against the trunk of the tree against which he had been leaning. He then lifted his eyes
and howled,not like the man, but like the several splashes of blood on the tree trunk ;
and she also saw that Heathcliff's hand were stained with blood. Most probably he had
been anxiously waiting for some news of Catherine who yet lay in her bed , dangerously
ill.

What is the message in Zabytko's "Home Soil"?

“Home Soil” centers upon the experiences and the guilt of
a Ukrainian American, the narrator, and his son, Bohdan. The narrator committed a war
crime in Ukraine during World War II, and he still replays “that scene in … [his] mind
almost forty years after it happened” (paragraph 33). His son Bohdan, who has lost his
Ukrainian roots (he prefers to be called “Bob” rather than “Bohdan” [paragraph 4]), has
undergone some similar but undisclosed experience in the Vietnamese
War.


The story itself takes place on a Sunday, the first
section being in church (paragraphs 1–36) and the second at the narrator’s home. The
parallel experiences of father and son reach a climax in paragraph 36, when the narrator
speaks of the impossibility of finding inner peace even though he is leading a totally
peaceful and successful life.


The son’s tears (paragraphs
40–42) show that he feels the same loss of inner peace. Interestingly, there is no
solution to the existence of guilt. As much as the narrator can say is “I don’t die.
Instead I go to the garden” (paragraph 37), an action that suggests the irrevocability
of inhuman actions and the permanence of guilt.

Monday, August 26, 2013

In The Book Thief, what are three events leading to the climax?

Note that there are more than three events leading to the
climax of The Book Thief since many things occur in the rising
action of the novel.  The climax of the book occurs very near the end of the book when
Himmel Street is bombed and Liesel loses all whom she loves.  Some major events leading
up to this are:


1.  The soldiers have book-burning sessions
in the streets, and Liesel watches as the books (and all knowledge) go up in flames. 
This is an early symbol that the people of Himmel Street will be stripped of all that
they know.


2.  When Hans agrees to take in Max, their home
is immediately put in danger.  The Hubermanns are in constant fear that someone will
realize that Max is hiding in the basement and that they will be punished by the German
soldiers for it.


3.  The German soldiers march the Jewish
prisoners through town on their way to Dachau.  They are obviously starving and being
led to their death.  The people in town see that their own survival is equally
precarious.

What is the narrative structure of Oedipus Rex?Oedipus Rex by Sophocles

The narrative structure of Oedipus
Rex
is that of a classical Greek play:


PROLOGUE
(first act)


In this part the play opens with the form of a
dialoge in which the protagonist expresses the statement on which the rest of the play
proceeds.  In Oedipus Rex, all the details necessary to Laius's murder are presented. 
From these details the plot will develop.  The prologue then ends with a choral oded
called the Parodos.


SCENE ONE
(prologue)


In this act the protagonist repeats the
statement from the porlogue, a statement that is developed by him in his speech.  Then,
with the introduction of a new character, the plot turns.  In Oedipus Rex, the prophet
Iresisas's arrival and his revelations about the birth and life of Oedipus fufill this
purpose.  Here, too, the conflict begins. 


The importance
of prophecies and the qualities of an ideal ruler are also introduced in this act. 
Then, the exposition ends with an ode call Stasimon
I.


SCENE TWO


This act marks
the rise in the action of the play.  The longest act, this is divided into three
scenes: 


  1. the confrontation between Oedipus and
    Creon,

  2. the intervention by Jocasta and her efforts
    toward persuasion

  3. the dialogue between Jocasta and
    Oedipus

The climax is suspended as this act
ends with a choral ode, the second Stasimon.


SCENE
THREE


The climax follows the second act of high action. 
All the questions raised in the previous act find their solutions in this act. The
mystery of Oedipus's ofe is solved and the play reaches its height and the tragedy is
complete.  In the fourth Stasimon, which ends the third scene, the chorus comments on
the fate of Oedipus.


SCENE FOUR
(exodus)


This scene presents the outcome of the tragedy. 
In this scene, the queen commits suicide and the desolate and devastated Oedipus blinds
himself.  Unlike the other acts, thes actions are not performed onstage; instead, they
are narrated by a messenger.


Finally, the blinded Oedipus
appears and alyrical dialogue between him and the Chorus is presented; this is a lament
on the situation.  After this lament, a long dialogue between Oedipus and Kreon
concludes the play as Oedipus, a broken man, departs as the citizens of Thebes look to
Kreon to find them an ideal king.

Explain how "Victimization" is a major theme in The Scarlet Letter.

It is clear from our first introduction to Hester Prynne
and her daughter that victimisation is a key theme of this novel based in Puritan New
England. As Hester, defenceless and by herself, bearing her babe in her arms, walks
through the crowd and mounts the scaffold for her punishment, it is clear that the
victimisation of individuals in this Puritan society for their "sin" is accepted and not
rejected by this society. Note how Hawthorne describes Hester's
punishment:


readability="14">

The unhappy culprit sustained herself as best a
woman might, under the heavy weight of a thousand unrelenting eyes, all fastened upon
her and concentrated at he bosom. It was almost intolerable to be borne. Of an impulsive
and passionate nature, she had fortified herself to encounter the stings
and venomous stabs of public contumely, wreaking itself in every variety of insult; but
there was a quality so much more terrible in the solemn mood of the popular mind, that
she longed rather to behold all those rigid countenanced contorted with scornful
merriment, and herself the
object.



It is deeply unjust
and unfair, of course, that it is just Hester, as the woman, who has to endure this
punishment for her "sin" alone, without her partner in crime, who, ironically, we later
see asking Hester to reveal the name of her partner. Hester, as a woman who has had a
child out of wedlock, is isolated and rejected by her society for the rest of the novel,
and this rejection stretches as well to her daughter, Pearl, who is feared and shunned
by Puritan society. Hawthorne presents us with an image of a civilisation that, once you
have been deemed not to fit into it, rejects you and victimises
you.

In Lord of the Flies, when do the boys lose their civility? And what are some of the events that lead up to the loss of civility? William Golding

In Lord of the Flies, it is dubious
whether Roger has possessed any civility at all.  For, in Chapter One, he is described
as a



slight,
furtive boy whom no one knew, who kept to himself with an inner intensity of avoidance
and secrecy.



Roger, the"dark
boy," then appears in Chapter Two to say that there has been no trace of a ship.
"Perhaps we'll never be rescued," he says.  Then, in Chapter Four he and Maurice come
down out of the forest and he leads the way through the sand castles that the littl'uns
have made


readability="12">

kicking them over, burying the flowers,
scattering the chosen stones....Only Percival began to whimper with an eyeful of sand
and Maurice hurried away.  In his other life Maurice had received chastisement for
filling a younger eye with sand.  Now, though there was no parent to let fall a heavy
hand.  Maurice still felt the unease of wrongdoing....He muttered something...and broke
into a trot...Roger remained, watching the
littluns.



When
Henry wanders off along the beach, Roger follows him, hiding beneath the palms.  Henry
goes to the beach and busies himself along the water's edge, playing with the "creatures
that lived in this last fling of the sea."  Roger waits, at first hidden, then he comes
out in full view.  Then, he looks along the beach and sees that the others have moved
on.  From above he


readability="13">

stooped, picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it
at Henry--threw it to miss.....Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old
life. Round the squatting child was the protection of parents and school and policemen
and the law.  Roger's arm was conditioned by a civilization that knew
nothing of him
and was in
ruins.



When Jack returns,
Roger sees him, and "a darker shadow crept beneath the swarthiness of his skin."  Jack
does not notice his ominous appearance and tells Roger about the mask that he has made
to disguise himself from the pigs.  "Roger understood and
nodded gravely."


At best, society conditioned Roger
somewhat, but his innate nature is sadistic and given free rein, Roger is soon cruel and
deadly.


Jack degenerates into savagery rather early on. In
Chapter Two as the boys build the fire on the mountain, Jack and Ralph work together
piling the branches and leaves.  When they finish Ralph and
Jack



looked at
each other while society paused about them.  The shameful knowledge grew
in them and they did not know how to begin
confession.



And,
even Ralph, who realizes that the boys fall silent at the sight of the new rescue fire,
feels the beginnings of


readability="5">

awe at the power set free below them.  The
knowledge and the awe made him
savage
.



Shortly
after this, when the fire goes out of control and Piggy scolds. Jack turns on Piggy,
"You shut up!"  He wants to silence the voice of civilization.  In Chapter Three, Jack
hunts and the imagery of his description is that of animals:  He breathes with
"flared nostrils"; his eye seem "bolting and
nearly mad
"; when he rouses a bird who sends "echoes...by a harsh cry
that seemed to come out of the abyss of ages," Jack shrinks with "a hiss
of indrawn b
reath," and for a moment, Golding
writes,



and
for a minute became less a hunter than a furtive thing,
ape-like
....He passed like a shadow under the darkness of the tree and
crouched....



After
he returns to camp, Jack squats and Ralph peers into "Jack's fierce, dirty face."  When
he does kill a pig, he "hacks at it."  In Chapter Four, Jack smacks Piggy's head,
knocking off his glasses with an opaque look in his
eyes.


In Chapter Five Jack takes over the meeting about the
beast, shouting "Bollocks to the rules!  We're strong--we hunt!  If there's a beast,
we'll hunt it down!...."  He Jack exhibits no rationality; he suggests just brute,
primitive force.  Certainly after he and the hunters steal the fire in Chapter Eight,
the descent into savagery accelerates as in Chapter Nine, the boys reveal in an feast
described in terms of Roman orgiastic feast where Jack sits "painted and garlanded like
an idol" and "piles of meat on green leaves near
him."



 


 

What is the significance of setting/place in Walden by Henry David ThoreauExplain the significance of setting/place in Walden

As a Transcendentalist, Henry David Thoreau held that
every indidual can reach ultimate truths through spiritual intuition, which transcends
reason and sensory experience. This spiritual intuition came best when man was in
communion with Nature, which is symbolic of the
spirit.


Believing that God was present in every aspect of
Nature, Thoreau went deliberately into the woods of
Walden



to
front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to
teach, and not, when I came to die,, discoer tha I had not
lived.



The woods and cabin of
Walden provided Thoreau with the existential experience for which he sought.  Away from
society and its corruptive devices, as Thoreau felt, he encountered the essential
lessons of life such as realizing how one-dimenstional members of society had become: 
"The mass of men....lead lives of quiet desperation."  Thoreau believed that if men
constructed their dwellings with their own hands as he had done his cabin, they would
develop the "poetic faculty" that nourishes the soul. 


In
the woods of Walden, away from society, Thoreau perceived the existential core of life
itself.  When Thoreau was dying of tuberculosis, his aunt reportedly asked him, "Henry
have you made your peace with God?"  "Why, Aunt," he replied, "I didn't know we had ever
quarreled."

Sunday, August 25, 2013

What are three characteristics of the Southern Gothic Tradition in "Sucker" by Carson McCullers?

One that stands out is the "grotesque". This
characteristic feature of Southern Gothic is not necessarily a monster, nor something
out of this world, but a really sensitive behavior that moves our insides to hating the
character. In this case, the protagonist was mean to Sucker every time Maybelle was mean
to the protagonist. So, in him we see the seething anger of humiliation and the pleasure
in humiliating others, so cruelly that it makes you feel disgusted at his attitude.
Grotesque is the equivalent of naturalism: Very cruel
reality.


Suspense and the touch of the supernatural is
another one: Something happened to Sucker after Pete did his biggest yelling and
humiliating tantrum. But, what was it? How come his eyes became so narrow that it
transformed his gesture to that resembling an old man? What is Sucker's real
problem?


The third would be the inevitability of fate.
Sucker was meant to have a harsh life because even as he was a baby he was hit by
tragedy when his parents got killed in a car accident. In Gothic lit, there will always
be an element of inevitability that will send a character spiraling down. As we know
Sucker changed, but for the worse. There is nothing dynamically changing in his life,
nor does there seem to be light at the end of his tunnel.

What was the importance of the abandoned city of Teotihuacan to the Aztecs?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4JabdIKx8s&feature=player_embedded

I believe that what you are asking about is the role that
the Teotihuacan played in "creating" the Aztec people.


The
Aztecs came to the Valley of Mexico as essentially a bunch of barbarians from the
North.  When they got to the Valley, they found the ancient city that was, by this time,
deserted.  They used the city's culture to create one of their own.  For example, they
borrowed many of the aspects of Teotihuacan's religion.


By
using the religion and to some extent the culture of the ancient city, they gave
themselves legitimacy.  Instead of a bunch of barbarians, they were the heirs of the
culture of Teotihuacan.

What is intermittent claudication?

Intermittent claudication is rather a symptom than a
disease. It consists in cramps, weakness and tension in the foot, especially in legs,
after muscular exercises. When symptoms appear, they are quickly removed by
resting.


Intermittent claudication is often associated with
atherosclerosis, Buerger's disease and other occlusive arterial
diseases.


People who smoke more than 15 cigarettes a day
are prone intermittent claudication, nine times more than nonsmokers.
A
regular program of exercises can be beneficial, especially for those who practice them
daily. Exercise should be done at least once a day, with ten repetitions for each
exercise. Most of the patients feel better after six weeks of exercises. As a supplement
to these exercises, the patient should do a daily walk.


Some researchers believe that an abnormally high blood
viscosity may be the cause of poor blood circulation. To reduce viscosity, patients
should have a diet low in fats, sugars and food concentrates. Since stress increases the
blood viscosity, the patients have to try to reduce the stress, as much as
possible.

What does the introduction tell the reader about Frankenstein.

It also tells us how she came to write it. It began as a
sort of exercise to pass some time, a challenge to write a horror story when she was
visiting with some friends in Geneva and the weather was cold and rainy. She also says
that the subject was of interest to her because she was interested in the ideas of
Darwin. She states that in presenting a scientifically impossible situation, she was
able to explore the depths of human passions in a way that she might not have been able
to under ordinary circumstances. Nevertheless, she has preserved what she believes are
the “truths” in human nature, even though dealing with the bizarre and fantastic. She
also denies that she had any purpose in espousing any doctrinal position (“nor is any
inference justly to be drawn from the following pages as prejudicing any philosophical
doctrine of whatever kind”). She also said that she was going to write other tales, but
the weather cleared up, and that was the end of it.


Do you
believe what she says? There is so much depth in this story and the themes are so
profound, it is hard to believe it is only a lark. However, that may be attributed to
the genius of Mary Shelley. She was only 19 when she wrote this.
Amazing.

How does one explain 'the arbitratiness of the sign' as one of Saussurean's principle?

Saussure's principle regarding "the arbitrariness of the
sign" refer to how meanings of words are given purely arbitrarly compared to the
physicality of the word. What that means is that words are "unmotivated signs" - there
is no inherent connection between a word and what it connotates or denotates. For
example, the word "tree" is in no way 'appropriate' to what it means. If one person says
"tree" to three people who are listening, one person may think of a 'maple tree,'
another a 'pine tree,' and another an 'apple tree.' There is no definition for a word
because of how the word looks. (Minor exceptions may be onomatopoeia, but it is
important to bear in mind that these vary by language.)

What are the similarities and differences between classical and operant conditioning?

Both classical and operant learning are psychological
processes that lead to learning. Here learning refers to the process by which changes in
behavior, including actions, emotions, thoughts, and the responses of muscles and
glands, results from experience or practice.


Classical
learning which is also called respondent learning is based on stimulus response
relationship. The learning of this type occurs when (a new stimulus begins to elicit
behaviour similar to that originally produced by an old stimulus. For example if a dog a
bell is sounded every time a dog is given food, the dog will begin salivating in
expectation of food just at the sound of bell. Classical conditioning process is
particularly important in influencing our emotional behaviour.  For example, we often
learn to fear a stimulus that has been combined with some other frightening
stimulus.


Operant learning, also called instrumental
conditioning, takes place as a result of what happens after a response is made. For
example, if a baboon is rewarded with food every time a button is pressed, it will learn
to press the button for obtaining food. In one famous experiment displaying operant
learning, the psychologist B.F. Skinner trained rats to press a lever to get food. In
this experiment,a hungry rat placed in a box containing a lever attached to some
concealed food.  At first, the rat ran around the box randomly. In this process it
happened to press the lever, and the food dropped into the box.  The dropping of food
reinforced the response of pressing the lever.  After repeating the process of pressing
the lever followed by dropping of food many times, the rat learned to press the lever
for food.

In Death of a Salesman, why does Miller juxtapose the scene of Linda reassuring Willy that he is a good man with the flashback to the woman?

Certainly there is much irony in this scene as Linda tells
Willy that he is a good man even though he has had an affair with this secret woman. 
Earlier in the play, Linda is seen mending her silk stockings, and Willy feels guilty
because he has bought his mistress several pairs of silk stockings.  Linda is Willy's
strength and the supporter of his dreams.  Although soft-spoken and seemingly passive,
Linda is a strong character who tries to maintain her husband's and sons' visions of the
American Dream.  Willy is not a good man, but Linda reminds the audience that he has the
potential to be.  Willy allows his delusions of himself to overtake his good qualities,
and this scene is representative of that.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Why is the murder so "unnatural" according to both Hamlet and the ghost?

Given the general feeling that one needed to repent of
their sins and receive last rites by a priest, the fact that Hamlet Sr. was murdered
without the opportunity to do so was a very big part of it being so
unnatural.


The other reasons have to do with the strange
way of poisoning him by dropping the ebona in his ear rather than a more manly way of
murdering him, the fact that it was his own brother who stole upon him in his hour of
repose, and add to that that it was simply not a very natural way for such a powerful,
accomplished man to exit his life.

Explain electrostatic phenomena in terms of the movement of electrons.Please give a detailed description on this.

Electrostatic phenomena result from the ability of
electrons to move relatively easily in many materials.  There are two general classes of
electrostatics:  induction and conduction.


Induction is
usually a temporary state where electrons within one substance are attracted or repelled
by a nearby charged object.  For example, if a positively charged object is brought near
a neutral object, the electrons in the neutral object are attracted to the positive
charge and the result is that within the neutral object the side toward the positive
charge develops a slightly negative charge and the side opposite the positive charge
develops a slighhtly positive charge.  The net charge of the neutral object is still
zero but the electrons are no longer evenly distributed within the object. When you
remove the positive charge the electrons within the neutral object redistribute and go
back to their original state.


When conduction occurs, a
charged object is brought into actual contact with a neutral object.  During this
contact, electrons actually move between the two objects and when the objects are
separated both objects now have the same charge.


For
example, a negative charge is brought into contact with a neutral object.  Some of the
excess electrons will move from the charged object to the neutral object. When they
separate the neutral object now has a negative charge (gained electrons) and the
negative object is still negative but less so (lost some of its excess electrons).   For
the case of a positive object and a neutral object brought into contact electrons now
move from the neutral object to the positive object and both become positively
charged.


An electroscope works on the same principle and is
used to detect charge in an object.


Some practical
applications of electrostatics are powder spray painting, electrostatic air filters in
homes, and electrostatic filters on tops of smokestacks of power plants burning
coal.


Electrostatic charges also exert forces on each other
which can be calculated using Coulomb's Law:  F = k Q1Q2/d
squared.

If log 8 = 3, how to find the value of log 32

We are given that log 8 = 3. Here the base of the
logarithm is not mentioned.


For a logarithm with the base
b, if log(b) a =c it follows that a = b^c.


We use this
relation here, let the base of the logarithm be
n.


Therefore log(n) 8 =
3


=> 8 = n^3


=>
2^3 = n^3


Hence n is 2. Now we now the base of the
logarithm is 2.


Therefore log (2) 32 = log (2) 2^5 =
5.



The value of log 32 is
5.

Friday, August 23, 2013

What could be the possible questions that the detective could have asked to Sam, the grocer?

I think that the first answer has most of the possible
questions.  I think that the questions about Mary's state of mind are the most
important.


Because we have read the story, we know that
Mary has rehearsed what she is going to say to Sam.  We know that she is going to try
hard to make him notice her and remember that she was there at that particular instant. 
You would think that this would make her act in an unnatural
way.


So I think the detective really should ask Sam about
how Mary acted.  He should ask if she seemed like herself.  He might even push and ask
specific questions -- did she seem excited, did she seem like she was trying to make you
remember her, did she seem like she was playing a rehearsed
role?


I think that the question about what she was carrying
is a little less useful -- after all, I doubt she would go to the store carrying the
murder weapon.

How does Napoleon try to solidify his leadership?

Napoleon tries to solidify his leadership much like his
Russian Revolution counterpart Joseph Stalin does... in multiple
ways.


1. Napoleon manipulates the animals by
talking to them one at a time.
He does this early in the book when
Snowball is trying to persuade animals to join him on his ideas. Napoleon is a dissenter
in the midst who talks individually to get them to see things his way, for example in
the case of the windmill.


2. Napoleon also
enlists the help of a gifted and crafty speaker on his behalf.
This is
Squealer. Stalin had Pravda as his mouthpiece in Russia. Napoleon uses Squealer to make
great speeches that demonstrate production is better than it was in Jones time by
shouting out tons of numbers.


3. Napoleon has
Squealer use propaganda
. Fear is an
emotional appeal they use corporately to get the animals to
remain faithful to the cause of animalism. The slogan "Four
legs good, Two legs bad" unifies the animals against a different enemy. Napoleon uses
Snowball as a scapegoat and they blame everything they do
not want to take credit for on him. So if it is a bad circumstance, Snowball gets the
blame.

How does Bradbury's use of literary devices such as symbolism, allusions, satire, and irony enrich Fahrenheit 451?

All of these devices offer several levels of meaning in
the novel. Bradbury is known for his descriptive style, particularly his adept use of
figurative language. Consider just the opening paragraph of the novel, with figurative
language in bold:


readability="14">

It was a special pleasure to see
things eaten
, to see things blackened and changed. With the brass nozzle
in his fists, with this great python spitting its venomous kerosene upon
the world
, the blood pounded in his head, and his hands were
the hands of some amazing conductor playing all the symphonies of blazing
and burning to bring down the tatters and charcoal ruins of history
. With
his symbolic helmet numbered 451 on his stolid head, and his eyes all
orange flam
e with the thought of what came next, he flicked the igniter
and the house jumped up in a gorging fire that burned the evening sky red
and yellow and black
. He strode in a swarm of fireflies.



That is a
power-packed paragraph! This wonderfully descriptive style is one reason this novel is
such a staple in classrooms across the nation. Another reason is Bradbury's use of
symbolism. The various symbols in the novel add depth and meaning to the plot.
Otherwise, this novel would be just a warning of a possible future. Yet in Bradbury's
hands, this becomes an allegory of humanity, the story of human society. Some symbols in
the book include fire, the salamander, and the Mechanical Hound. Fire is perhaps the
most potent symbol in the novel. It is a destructive force, eradicating books and the
freedom of thought that books represent. Yet later, when he is with the book people,
fire becomes a sign of connection, a renewal of human relationships. The salamander
connects to the fire, as the symbol of the firemen. In myth, the salamander is a lizard
that breathes fire, linking again to the opening paragraph of the novel
itself.


Finally, the Mechanical Hound represents the
disconnect between humans and technology. As society has become increasingly mechanized,
even the machines that human hands have built have turned against them. When the
Mechanical Hound pursuing Montag is destroyed, another one is sent in its place,
suggesting that technology used destructively cannot be easily
demolished.


Thus, Bradbury's techniques offer nuance and
shades of meaning to the novel. Without this style, the book would become a good science
fiction story, but not a classic of science fiction literature (or any
genre).

Which are some of the famous literary awards?

Adolescent literature is recognized each year by several
major groups. They include:


NEWBERRY
MEDAL
.  The John Newberry Medal is the most
prestigious honor given to writers of children's and adolescent literature. It is
sponsored by the Association for Library Service to Children (a division of ALA, the
American Library Association). It has been presented annually since 1922 and is named
for the 18th publisher of children's
books.


CALDECOTT MEDAL.  Also
presented by the ALSC and the ALA, this award was named for Randolph Caldecott, a 19th
century illustrator.


ALAN. The
Assembly on Literature for Adolescents also awards a prize
for outstanding teen writing each
year.


YALSA. The
Young Adult Library Association gives six literary awards
annually for books aimed at teen reader interest.

There is a conflict between Hamlet and Claudius in Act 2. Who has the advantage at the end of Act 2 and why?This question is from Hamlet by William...

Well, since Hamlet and Claudius never even speak to each
other in Act II, I'm guessing you meant Polonius?  The two of them do, indeed, seem to
have a bit of a conflict toward the end of this
act. 


Polonius is convinced Hamlet is mad with love for his
daughter, and Hamlet is clearly playing that up in this scene.  He calls Polonius a
fish-monger, tells him to take care that his daughter doesn't get pregnant...among other
disrespectful things.  They're interrupted by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, then the
players, and the two of them begin again.  They have a disagreement about the speech the
player is giving.  Polonius says it's too long (isn't that ironic)
and Hamlet says, in essence, play on! 


Their final
disagreement comes when Hamlet asks Polonius to show the players to their rooms and
treat them well.  Polonius says he will treat them as they deserve.  Hamlet gets angry
at that and says,


readability="5">

"Use every man after his desert and who shall
scape whipping?" 



As the last
Player leaves, Hamlet says, "...look you mock him not."  Clearly he does care for the
man despite this verbal sparring, even if it's only because Hamlet cares for his
daughter.  Hamlet appears to have the advatage, because Polonius thinks he's mad and
treats him rather delicately because of it. The next time they see one another, Hamlet
mocks Polonius even more, and this time publicly; and Polonius just takes
it.

Is Injun Joe guilty or innocent and is Muff Potter guilty or innocent?

This depends to some extent on what you are talking about
-- what crime.  But I would say that both men are guilty of something.  However, Injun
Joe is guilty of much more than Muff Potter is.


Both men
are clearly guilty of going out to rob the grave.  That is why they are in the graveyard
in the first place.  But Muff Potter is not really guilty of much more than that.  By
contrast, Injun Joe is clearly guilty of killing the doctor.  That is surely much more
important than grave robbery.


Later on, we also find that
Joe is guilty of theft and of at least planning to harm the widow.  Muff is not guilty
of these things either.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

What do you predict Tom will do?"Contents of the Dead Man's Pockets" by Jack Finney

For the author of "Contents of the Dead Man's
Pockets," Jack Finney, Tom Benecke illustrates the delicate balance of what people set
as their priorities as opposed to what is truly meaningful in their lives.  Tom's moment
of truth on the ledge of his eleven-floor apartment causes him to realize that he has
been wasting valuable time on climbing the business ladder when he should have been
fostering his relationship with his wife.  Faced with the possibility of dying and
losing any opportunity to be with the woman he loves, Tom mourns the death of time that
he has created, and he resolves to save his life by valuing the time he has been
given:



All
they'd find in his pockets would be the yellow sheet. Contents of the dead
man's pockets
, he thought, one sheet of paper bearing penciled
notations
--incomprehensible.



When,
fortuitously, Tom lands inside the apartment, he simply places the paper where it had
been, and "shakes his head wonderingly," indicating that he is amazed at what a risk
he has taken simply to earn a raise.  It is a changed man who takes his topcoat and hat
and open the door to go out only to see the yellow sheet "sail out into the night and
out of his life."  With the sheet gone, Tom simply laughs
at his previous ridiculous thoughts and behavior.


That the
author writes of the yellow sheet's being "out of his life," and that Tom laughs
indicate his complete change of attitude.  Clearly, his priorities have changed and Tom
will devote more time to his marriage.

Describe Pi's rescue at the end of Life of Pi.

It is interesting, because he isn't really "rescued," but
rather "salvaged" when his lifeboat comes on shore in Mexico.  He and Richard Parker got
lucky, finally, when their lifeboat finally came into contact with land.  Pi manages to,
through great effort, get his lifeboat onto the shore safely.  Richard Parker
immediately leaps out and runs into the jungle, without even a glance back. That event,
Pi says, hurts him more than he would have thought.  He
comments,



"I
wept like a child...because Richard Parker had left me so
unceremoniously."



Pi is then
discoverd by women in a village who bathe and feed him before he is picked up by the
police and taken to the hospital.


In the hospital, he is
questioned by Japanese officials who are investigating the sinking of his ship months
before.  This is where we learn that there is another possible story that Pi was
covering with the animal story, one that is much more tragic and horrifying.  The
Japanese officials get caught up in the entire thing--animal story AND human one, and
are engaged in Pi's recounting of events.  Pi lets them decide which story they like
better, and that pretty much sums it up.


I hope that
helped; good luck!

What are three metaphors in Act 1. Sc. 4 of Hamlet?

1. (vv26-27) Hamlet speaking: By the o'ergrowth
of some complexion, oft breaking down the pales and forts of
reason...


Metaphor that transforms the human
body in a citadel where  reason is kept. Shakespeare often refers, in this drama, the
human microcosm to a citadel or a castle.



2.(vv
36-37) Hamlet speaking: The dram of evil doth all the noble substance of a
doubt to his own scandal


Evil spreads like an
infection. Like the human body, even the society could be corrupted by an infection due
to a mistake of nature or a dissolute tradition or a human
sin.



3.(vv 69-70) Horatio speaking:
What if it tempt you toward the flood, my lord, or to the dreadful summit of
the cliff


The vertigo of the cliff is a metaphor
of the reason that Hamlet could loose following the ghost. Hamlet could go haywire
trying to understand the
supernatural.




4.The Nemean Lion- (vv
82-85) Hamlet speaking: My fate cries out, and makes each petty artere in this
body as hardy as the Nemean lion's nerve.


The
Nemean lion is a monster in Greek mythology whose fur was invulnarable. Hamlet warns
that nobody could stop him to follow the ghost.

In "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight," the interlacing of the hunting and bedroom scenes are essential features. How are we invited to respond?In...

The hunting scenes and bedroom scenes are used as
parallels in the story.


The whole idea behind Bertilak's
(the Green Knight) behavior is to test Gawain, to see if he is worthy of being called a
true and honorable knight of King Arthur's court.


The
hunting done by Bertilak parallels the attempted seduction of Gawain by Bertilak's wife.
 Literally, Bertilak is hunting during the day, and comes home to share the fruits of
his endeavors. However, figuratively, Bertilak is hunting, too, for some sense of the
honor Gawain professes to have in serving Arthur. So as Bertilak "hunts" for answers,
his wife "hunts" as well, each day trying to get Gawain to behave dishonorably with her,
taking advantage of the hospitality of Bertilak. (And remember, Gawain does not
know that Bertilak is really the Green
Knight.)


According to "Notes on Middle English Romance"
compiled by Jonathan A. Glenn (see website listed below), the tale of Gawain is not
written as a cause and effect story, "but in terms of juxtaposition and analogy ("this
is like that")." The juxtaposition is the hunting in the woods and the "pursuit" in the
bedroom.


In essence, I would suggest then, that we are
asked to look at the story and realize that the one part of the story (hunting by
Berilak) coincides with his wife's pursuits in judging the worth of a
man
(Gawain). The reader is supposed to understand that Gawain lives with
honor when he refuses to be seduced by his host's wife.  The author of the Gawain tale
wants the reader to also understand, as Berilak himself does, that Gawain's only flaw
(in concealing the gift of the magic "belt") is his desire to live when he is sure the
Green Knight will kill him.

wat does compare and contrast the ways in which two plays present the idea of women who 'break the rules' mean?What rules are they breaking? M...

The question asks you to analyze what you have read in the
two plays, paying specific attention to the idea of women who "break the
rules."


"Compare and contrast" asks you to first find
similarities (compare) as to how the topic of women breaking rules is presented.  You
could briefly summarize each play and write about what both plays have in common
regarding "women breaking the rules," supported with specific examples from the
text.


Next, in contrasting the two plays, you would
summarize and show how they each handle the theme of "women who break the rules"
differently, supported with specific examples.


In other
words, in the comparison you might be able to find what is common between both plays in
the rules the women break? Do they break the same kinds of rules?  In contrasting the
two plays, you might well address the consequences in each play for the women who broke
the rules: are the consequences the same, or are the consequences in each
different?


You might also want to draw some kind of
conclusion as to what you think about what you have discovered.

Allusions in The Great Gatsby?In what chapter/paragraph can I find an allusion to another work or event?

Perhaps the most memorable allusion is in Chapter One. 
When Nick Carraway meets Tom Buchanan, Tom emerges as supercilious and arrogant.  When
Nick innocuously remarks, "You make me feel uncivilized, Daisy," his words are taken up
in "an unexpected way" by Tom, who breaks out
violently,


readability="7">

"Civilization's going to pieces,...I've gotten to
be a terrible pessimist about things.  Have you read The Rise of the Coloured
Empires
by this man
Goddard?"



The Rise
of the Coloured Empires
was written by Lothrop Goddard; it postulates the
collapse of the white empire and colonialism, because of the rise in population of the
black people.  Ironically, Tom misinterprets Goddard's book because Goddard did not
advocate a white race bid for world domination as Tom wants to believe.  Instead Goddard
questions the white man's right to invade other countries and impose its will upon other
peoples.


Then, in Chapter Five as Nick brings Daisy to
Gatsby's house, Daisy and Gatsby try to act nonchalant.  Gatsby looks with "vacant eyes
through a copy of Clay's Economics.  Henry Clay, of course, was a
prominent congressman from Kentucky who sought to bring tarriff laws against the
British.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

In Fahrenheit 451 what did Montag once tell Clarisse about the odor of kerosene?

The answer to this one can be found in the passage from
the very first time that Clarisse and Montag met.  He was walking home from work, and
met her on the sidewalk.  She said that she knew he was coming before she even saw him. 
He is confused at this and asks how--she says its because he smells like kerosene, and
that all firemen smell like kerosene.  Montag laughs at this, and says that was probably
true, because his wife, Mildred, always complains about it, even after he has showered. 
He then admmits that "kerosene...is nothing but perfume to me."  At this point, Montag
thinks that he loves his job, loves burning books, and loves even the smells associated
with his work.  All of those perceptions are about to change, however. I hope that
helped; good luck!

Discuss the importance and the charity of strangers in Angela's Ashes.

Frank McCourt's family relies almost exclusively on
charity, the Church and luck to survive the poverty in which they found themselves.  The
Catholic Church in the town operated thrift stores and charities which the McCourt's
received furniture from when they had more children, and food from in difficult
times.


Sometimes McCourt's mother, abandoned by Frank's
alcoholic father, resorted to borrowing and begging from the corner store to extend her
some credit so the kids could have "rashers (bacon) and eggs".  The rent was often late,
the pantry often empty and the kids poorly dressed.  Charity, quite literally, was how
the family survived as well as it did.

Prove the following trigonometric identities (a) sec^6A - tan^6A=1 + 3 tan^2 A * Sec^2 A (b) cos^4A - sin^4A = 2 cos^2 a - 1 (a) sec^6A -...

To prove


sec^6-tan^6A =
1+3tan^2A*sec^2A.



Put sec^2A = x and tan^2A = y.
Then sec^2A-tan^2A= 1 is also an identity. So x-y = 1. Using these, we
get:


(x^3-y^3) = (x-y)(x^2+xy+y^2) is
andentity.


sec^6A - tan^6A = 1*(sec^4A
+sec^2A*tan^2A+tan^4A) = {(1+tan^2)sec^2A + sec^2A*tan^2A+ }
=


(sec^2A+tan^2Asec^2A +sec^2Atan^2A+(sec^2A-1)tan^2A) =
(3sec^2Atan^2A +sec^A-tan^2A)


= 3tan^2Asec^2A+1, as
sec^A-tan^2A = 1.


Threrefore,  sec^6A -tan^6A =
1+3tan^2A*sec^2A.


b)


We use
a^2-b^2 = (a-b) (a+b) and  sin^x+ cos^2x = 1


LHS =
(cos^4A-sin^4A = (cos^2A-sin^2A)(cos^2A+sin^2A) ,


=
cos^2A-sin^2A


=cos^2A-(1-cos^2A)


=
cos^2A-1+cos^2A


= 2cos^2A-1 =
RHS.


c)


LHS =
sinA(1+tanA)+cosA(1+cotA)


= sinA+sin^2A/cosA + cosA
+cos^A/sinA


= sinA +(1-cos^2A)/cosA +cosA
+(1-sin^2A)/sinA


= sinA+1/cosA -cosA +cosA +1/sinA -
sinA


= 1/sinA +1/cosA


=
cosecA+secA =
RHS.


=


=

Write ( x^3/2)^4/3]*(x^1/4)/x as x raised to a power.

We'll write the first term of the product from
numerator as:


(x^m)^n = x^(m*n), where m = 3/2 and n =
4/3


(x^3/2)^4/3 =
x^(3*4/2*3)


We'll simplify and we'll
get:


(x^3/2)^4/3 = x^2


Now,
we'll solve the product from
numerator:


[(x^3/2)^4/3]*(x^1/4) =
(x^2)*(x^1/4)


Since the bases are matching, we'll add the
exponents:


(x^2)*(x^1/4) = x^(2 +
1/4)


x^(2 + 1/4) = x^9/4


Now,
we'll solve the ratio:


 x^9/4/x = x^(9/4 -
1)


x^(9/4 - 1) =
x^5/4

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

What are the four reasons the Eurasians were able to conquer the Americans after 1492?This is from Chapter 18 "Hemispheres Colliding" in Guns,...

The best place to find a brief version of this answer is
on p. 370 in my copy of the book.


According to Diamond,
there are three sets of what he calls "ultimate factors" that are responsible for
allowing the Eurasians to defeat the Americans.  These
are:


  1. Eurasia had people long before the Americas
    had people.  So the Old World had a huge head start on building
    civilizations.

  2. Eurasia, for geographical reasons and
    because of luck, had better food production.

  3. Eurasia, for
    geographical reasons (mainly the long east-west axis) was more conducive to having
    innovations spread across it.  Thus an innovation discovered in one place could spread
    across the whole area.

Diamond says that there
is one more cause that is "more speculative."  He thinks that it is the fact that the
Americas' population centers were widely separated and had few connections with each
other.

What are some metaphor and allusion examples in Fahrenheit 451?

You can find examples of allusions and metaphors in every
chapter of this novel - even on every page. For example, in the first chapter, Montag
walks into his home after talking to Clarisse and realizes he is not happy. His wife,
Mildred, is home watching her screens and she looks up at
him:



Two
moonstones looked up at him in the light of his small hand-held fire; two pale
moonstones buried in a creek of clear water over which the life of the world ran, not
touching them.



The
"moonstones" are Mildren's eyes.


Also, there are tons of
allusions in this novel. Why? Because the firemen are book burners. Every time they are
talking about books, they are alluding to authors. Again, in the first
chapter:


readability="10">

"It's fine work. Monday bum Millay, Wednesday
Whitman, Friday Faulkner, burn 'em to ashes, then bum the ashes. That's our official
slogan."



This allusion is
to poets Edna St. Vincent Millay, Walt Whitman and author William Faulkner, all authors
whose books were burned by Montag and his fellow firemen.

In Chapter 9-10, Why do Mrs. Joe and Pumblechook believe Pip's tale?Great Expectations by Charles Dickens

Uncle Pumblechook of Dickens's Great
Expectations
is a stereotype of the rising middle class that aspires to be
wealthy and to imitate what Dickens considered a frivolous aristocracy.  In short, he is
a fauner and a flatterer. Like her uncle, Mrs. Joe perceives the upper class as
superior; anything that they do has justification and is only unusual to those of the
lower classes.  Because of this admiration for the upper class, Pip feels that Miss
Havisham will be misunderstood if he describes her
realistically:


readability="9">

I entertained an impression that there would be
something coarse and treacherous in my dragging her as she really was (to say nothing of
Miss Estella)before the contemplation of Mrs. Joe.  Consequently, I said as little as I
could, and had my face shoved against the
wall.



When the "bullying"
Uncle Pumblechook comes to tea, Pip is even more inclined to be reticent about the
truth.  When Uncle Pumblechook interrogates Pip, finally Pip fabricates an elaborate
tale of Miss Havisham's sitting in a velvet coach with four dogs that fought for veal
cutlets out of a silver baskets.  Since Pumblechook has never been allowed into the
house, and since Pip describes the room as lit only by candles, a situation with which
Pumblechook is familiar, Pip's uncle verifies the
tale:



"That's
true, Mum....That's the state of the case, for that much I've seen
myself."



Added to this truth,
Mrs. Joe and Uncle Pumblechook want to believe Pip, for their awe of the aristocracy
is so fatuous that they want to think they are unique in their habits and very different
in their ways.

How can the reader tell who won the final ecounter between Rainsford and Zaroff?

You can tell this by looking at the final line or two
lines of the story.  They do not literally come out and say to us "and then Rainsford
killed Zaroff," but they do tell us what we need to
know.


In the next to the last paragraph, the two of them
square off to fight.  Zaroff lets us know that the fight will be a fight to the death. 
He says that one of them is going to end up being fed to the dogs.  But the other one
will get to sleep in a very nice bed.  So that tells us what's going on -- one dies, one
sleeps in the bed.


Then the last line tells us that
Rainsford thought that the bed was very comfortable.  If he can think that, he is
clearly the one who is alive and sleeping in the bed, not the one who is dead and being
fed to the dogs.


Here are the relevant
lines:


readability="11">

The general made one of his
deepest bows. "I see," he said. "Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the
hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford." . .
.

He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford
decided.


Monday, August 19, 2013

How do the forms of rhetoric (logos, ethos, and pathos) play a part in The Crucible?If you have any quotes from the story that would be nice...I...

These three forms of rhetoric cross each other in the
character of John Proctor. I think he is depicted as the everyman person who makes
mistakes but wants to do the right thing and be an honorable person if at all
possible.


I see logos (a logical perspective) in Proctor in
many one-liners throughout the text. He tries to achieve understanding amongst parties
in discussion by pointing out simple facts. He does so particularly effectively with
Rev. Parris in Act I when Putnam is getting pushy. Putnam tries to throw his land weight
around to get his way and Proctor reminds him:


readability="6">

You cannot command Mr. Parris. We vote by name in
this society, not by
acreage.



Further in the text,
Putnam challenges Proctor for not being at church, again Proctor comes in with a fact, a
truth:



There
are many others who stay away from church these days because [he] hardly ever mentions
God anymore.



Ethos (an
awareness of the ethical and moral necessities within a person) is demonstrated through
Proctor's efforts to rebirth his marriage. He could have Abigail. She continues to
pursue him after their affair ended months ago. But despite her advances in Act I (They
both have great one liners in there for quotes) he refuses to be tempted again. When she
mentions Elizabeth, his moral indignation rises and he defends his
woman.


Pathos (a person's emotional perspective) displays
itself through Proctor as well. Proctor's anger about all that is going on spurs from
his ethos, his stance that what is going on is wrong. In Act I, Proctor calls it like he
sees it with Rebecca Nurse as they believe the girls are pretending. No one else seems
to see it, but this everyman is willing to stand trial eventually and risk his life for
truth. Throughout his journey his anger is displayed at Abby, Parris and the
magistrates.

In an electric circuit, why is it dangerous to use long cables?Please explain to me in detail.

It is not right to say that it is always dangerous to use
long cables, or that shortest possible cables are always constitute the best alternative
in electrical circuits. However, shorter cables do present some advantages. Some of
these have been identified in the answer above. I would like to add the following to the
ones identified.


  • Longer the cable, greater the
    chances of their getting damaged. This may result in leaking of current due to poor
    insulation. For high voltage circuits this can be
    dangerous.

  • Longer cables cost
    more.

However, in some cases it may be
desirable to increase the length of cable to organize the neat cable layout that avoids
excessive crisscrossing of cables, and cables running across some of the other
components of the circuits. In permanent electrical circuits running over long
distances, provision is usually made for some additional length of cable so that any
subsequent repairing of faults in the cable will not result in the available length of
cable falling short of the minimum required to cover the distance between the two ends
of the cable.

What does the poem "Five Ways to Kill a Man" by Edwin Brock say about the survival of the human race?The poem is called "Five Ways to Kill a Man"...

This poem is filled with irony. The author refers to
several kinds of "warfare."


First he refers to the
crucifixion of Christ (plank of wood, cock that crows, and a hill,
etc.).


Next, he refers to the killing of knights during the
medieval period (length of steel, metal cage he wears, and a castle,
etc.).


The third stanza refers to World War I (gas, rats,
and a dozen songs), while the fourth stanza refers to World War II (the atomic bomb and
Hitler—the psychopath).


Through the entire "timeline" of
the poem, the author talks about these "cumbersome" ways of killing, while paradoxically
each stanza shows advancements in more sophisticated ways to
kill.


However, the pivotal point in the poem is found with
the final stanza. It reiterates that all the prior methods listed are cumbersome. This
is a surprise, not for the first several stanzas, but it is for the
stanza on World War II: when advanced technology had created an atomic bomb that brought
about Japan's surrender.


The final irony is the author's
message that advancements in technology provide no better way for killing: the best way
to kill, he pro ports, is to leave mankind to its own devices. By
doing so, men will kill themselves in the way they live during the most advanced age
known to man, the twentieth century. In other words, when mankind should have the most
answers to avoid war, without any help the human race will
"self-destruct."

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Please compare "Dusk" by Saki and "The Umbrella Man" by Roald Dahl as stories of tricksters.

People who live in the country can satisfy some needs,
especially for food, without money. But city people need money for everything. Money is
their preoccupation. Both “Dusk” and “The Umbrella Man” are about money. As Wordsworth
wrote:



The
world is too much with us; late and soon,
Getting and spending, we lay waste
our powers;
Little we see in Nature that is ours;
We have given our
hearts away, a sordid
boon!



Those at the bottom beg
for money. Most panhandlers barely survive.They can only obtain small sums and a lot of
rejections. The interesting similarity between the tricksters in “Dusk” and “The
Umbrella Man” is that both have devised ways of getting money without working and
without begging.


Gortsby’s trickster poses as a gentleman
of leisure because he fancies himself in that role and is trying to live comfortably
without working. He talks of foreign cities and going to “one’s Consul.” The notion of
having to go out to buy special soap is a nice touch: it shows refined tastes and broad
experience with traveling. Gortsby tries to keep up with
him:



“I
remember doing exactly the same thing once in a foreign capital, and on that occasion
there were two of us, which made it more
remarkable.”



Gortsby was not
planning to give the stranger money, regardless of whether or not his story was true.
When he finds the soap, however, he pursues him. He is embarrassed about insulting a man
he takes to be a social superior. He gives the stranger his card, not only in order to
have his loan repaid by mail, but probably hoping to become better acquainted with a
member of the upper class. From the beginning there is a suggestion that if Gortsby
lends the stranger a sovereign he might get invited for a weekend  at one of those ugly
country mansions where the hunting dogs sleep on the furniture. This is never explicitly
stated, but the con man’s story contains many suggestions and
implications.


readability="6">

“Unless I can find some decent chap to swallow my
story and lend me some money I seem likely to spend the night on the
Embankment.”



“Decent chap” is
a nice touch. Sounds like Oxford and Eton.


The “umbrella
man” also poses as a member of a superior social class. After all, he can afford to own
an umbrella worth twenty pounds and virtually give it away for one pound, whereas the
girl-narrator’s mother says:


readability="5">

“Aren’t we lucky. I’ve never had a silk umbrella
before. I couldn’t afford
it.”



In fact, mother and
daughter were standing there getting drenched by the downpour because they didn’t have
any umbrella at all.


readability="9">

“A real gentleman,” she went on. “Wealthy, too,
otherwise he wouldn’t have had a silk umbrella. I shouldn’t be surprised he if isn’t a
titled person.”



This
trickster also has aspirations to a higher standard of living than he can afford. When
mother and daughter follow him to the pub, they see him order a triple whiskey and
probably leave enough of a tip to use up the entire one-pound note, before helping
himself to another silk umbrella.


Both Saki’s youthful
trickster and Roald Dahl’s elderly trickster are getting money by posing as members of
the upper class rather than as needy panhandlers. Both are living out fantasies of
actually being such gentlemen of independent means.


The
elderly "umbrella man" will probably drink himself to death or die of pneumonia from
walking around in the rain. Gortsby’s young trickster will go on to bigger scams and end
up in prison or in Parliament.

In The Merchant Of Venice what do Antonio and Shylock think of each other?

I think you need look no further than Act I scene 3 to
find a full description of how Shylock and Antonio think about each other. In many ways,
the central conflict of the play is between these two characters, as Shylock seems to
pick Antonio as a representative of all those who have mocked and disparaged his people
or tribe, and Antonio seems to pick out Shylock especially for bad treatment because of
his race.


Shylock's aside in Act I scene 3 when Antonio
enters his office is particularly telling, revealing the reasons for his hatred and
dislike:



How
like a fawning publican he looks!


I hate him for he is a
Christian,


But more for that in low
simplicity


He lends out money gratis and brings
down


The rate of usance here with us in
Venice.



Later on in the same
scene, Shylock openly confronts Antonio with the behaviour he has shown Shylock, saying
that he has bullied him, insulted him and spat on him. Of course, Shylock is enjoying
the twist of fate that has Antonio, his enemy, who has so often mistreated him, come to
Shylock begging for money, and is using this incident to point out to Antonio the
inhumanity of his treatment of Shylock. But it is clear that Antonio, in his response,
feels no remorse:


readability="24">

I am like to call thee so
again,


To spit on thee again, to spurn thee
too.


If thou wilt lend this money, lend it
not


As to thy friends, for when did friendship
take


A breed for barren metal of his
friend?


But lend it rather to thine
enemy,


Who, if he break, thou mayst with better
face


Exact the
penalty.



Antonio here
expresses no guilt, but maintains the existence of the enmity between him and Shylock,
basically offering Shylock the chance to gain his revenge if Antonio is unable to pay
back the loan. Note too that after Shylock's reference to Jacob's gulling of his father
in law, Laban, Antonio compares Shylock to the Devil in his ability to twist scripture
to make it say what he wants it to say.


Clearly, therefore,
both Shylock and Antonio have a deep and bitter hatred of each other, based on Antonio's
mistreatment of Shylock. I think that it is particularly interesting that Antonio
chooses to punish Shylock in the most profound way possible at the end of the story -
Antonio knows that Shylock would prefer death than conversion, and it is a very cruel
ending which should give the audience sympathy for Shylock.

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...