Wednesday, November 18, 2015

From No. 78 of The Federalist Papers, why does the author believe that judges should have permanent tenure?

The whole basis of the Constitution's system of government
is the idea that you have checks and balances.  In this system, you have to have
branches of government that can interfere with each other.  At the same time, though,
the branches have to be independent.  This need for independence is why judges need life
tenure.  As the author says


readability="5">

nothing will contribute so much as this (life
tenure) to that independent spirit in the
judges...



The reasoning here
is this -- if the judges can be removed at the whim of the Congress or the President,
how will they ever be independent?  If they are not independent, they will just do what
the Congress or President wants.  If that is all they do, how will they protect us from
illegal actions by either of the other two branches.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...