Monday, June 15, 2015

What happens to Don John at the end of Much Ado About Nothing?

The answer is that we do not really know what is going to
happen to Don John after the play ends.  All we really know is that he is in
trouble.


At the end of Act V, Scene 4, we know that John
has run away from Messina but has been caught.  A messenger tells that to Don Pedro in
one of the last lines of the play.  We do not know for sure what is going to happen to
him next, but we do know that he is likely to be punished for his crimes against Hero. 
Benedick is going to think up some "brave punishments" for Don Pedro to inflict on Don
John.

How do you trace foucauldian concept of disciplinary power in Streetcar and Glass Menagerie?

I think that there could be many different ways to read
Foucault's notion of power in both of Williams' work.  In the case of Blanche, Stanley
uses the notion of insanity and mental illness to exert power over her and to control
Stella.  While Blanche might be suffering from some level of mental illness, Stanley
uses this label as a construct of power in order to maintain his control over Stella and
not disrupt the distribution of resources that are in accordance with the trappings of
power.  In this case, the determination of mental illness, the exclusionary practice to
consolidate the control of those who have power over those who lack it is evident in the
rushed manner in which Stanley convinces Stella to commit her sister.  In much the same
manner, Amanda is able to exert her control over the family, Laura in particular,
because she creates the persona of her daughter being challenged or mentally
incapacitated.  While Amanda would never admit it because of the social stigma or shame
it would cause, part of her ability to extol the virtues of her own youth and create a
sense of nostalgia her own past is because Laura is so very different.  In this setting,
the construct of power and control is only evident when the term "mental illness" or
"different" is applied to Laura, whereby she is seen as inferior and insufficient while
Amanda is supposed to represent the accepted and "good" norm.

For Trifles, write a speech you think Minnie Wright might deliver before the sentence was given if the canary were found and Minnie...

This is something that you have to write for yourself, but
we can give you some ideas. There are several options, but if you want to stay true to
character, I don't think Minnie Wright would really have much to say in her own defense.
She would probably let her attorney do it for her. We don't know much about her
character, but we do know that she lived with an abusive man for years...without doing
anything about it and without telling anyone about it. So, if you have to write
something that she said, it would not be very forceful, and
perhaps she would be timid about delivering it, but...you could still do it in a clever
way so that the jury could still see the truth of her sad situation. For
example:


Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am just not
used to speaking in front of a crowd, so you will have to forgive me for being a little
nervous. I just spilled my water on my shirt, and it's my favorite shirt. I embroidered
a little yellow canary on it, can you see him? Right above the pocket? It reminds me of
my poor little Tweetie, God rest his soul. Well, so.... What's that? You want me to
speak up? Oh, I'm sorry. I guess I do have a soft voice. I'll try to speak a little
clearer. You see, my husband poured vinegar down my throat a few months ago because he
said I talked too much, and it destroyed some of the lining of my throat, so I can't
talk too loud. Okay, how's this? Can you all hear me now? Okay, so, where was I? Oh yes,
you wanted me to speak in my own defense. Well, I wrote some notes down here, but I
can't read them very well--you see, my husband threw his potato soup at me a few months
ago--he said it was too bitter--and some of it burned my left eye, so it's hard for me
to read. Anyway, let's see. Oh yes, well....


You could
continue in this way and let the woman's pitiful character speak for her. It would be a
unique approach. What do you think?

Sunday, June 14, 2015

What are the key Elizabethan ideas we need to know in order to understand Hamlet?The importance of order/harmony, the Great Chain of Being, the...

One belief that is necessary for an understanding of
Shakespeare's Hamlet is the belief that Gertrude's marriage to
Claudius is an act of incest.  The marriage, therefore, is not just unusual, and is not
just uncomfortable for Hamlet, it is sinful.


Gertrude would
have become one with King Hamlet's family when she married into it.  Marrying King
Hamlet's brother (Claudius) was seen as marrying a member of her own family.  Thus, the
marriage is incestuous, as Hamlet says in the play.


This
helps to explain Hamlet's obsession with the marriage and, particularly, with Gertrude's
sex life.  Gertrude having sex with Claudius, viewed by Elizabethans, is an incestuous
act.  She is living in sin, in Hamlet's eyes. 


Hamlet has
not only lost his father unexpectedly, lost his rightful throne, and experienced his
mother's hasty remarriage, but he has also experienced his mother committing incest to
satisfy, as he sees it, her sexual desires. 


Gertrude's
marriage to Claudius is not so hideous to a modern audience.  To fully appreciate
Hamlet's situation, however, one must understand the Elizabethan idea that the marriage
is incestuous. 

Who did Jared Diamond say were the haves and have nots in Guns, Germs, and Steel?

According to Diamond, the "haves" are those populations
who developed food production early and successfully.  The "have-nots" are the
populations of people who remained hunters-and-gatherers while the rest of the world was
modernizing and stabilizing.


The result was that the
"haves" were able to settle down, develop farming techniques, and as a result, move
quickly into conquering because the development of farming naturally led to the
development of "guns, germs and steel."  Today we know exactly who the "haves" are as
compared to the "have-nots" simply by looking at the
globe.


Chapter 5, Guns, Germs, and
Steel

How do I write answers for poetry so I can write better answers and give better interpretations?I wanted to know how I can write answers and...

When writing about poetry, you want to discuss the
structure, literary/poetic elements and literary/poetic, techniques. Firstly, in
structure, along with identifying the genre and sub-genre, e.g., lyric and sonnet, you
will want to analyze the rhythm and the meter, which when added together create the
metric pattern, e.g., trochaic tetrameter. You will also identify the rhyme scheme;
e.g., abab cddc. You will also discuss the structure of stanzas and individual verses
[verse(s) is the poetic term for line(s)]. These considerations also include blank verse
and free verse and other variations on rhythm, meter and
rhyme.


Secondly, you will analyze and discuss the literary
device of literary elements, although when applied to poetry these are called poetic
devices and poetic elements. Some poetic elements are theme; speaker/narrator: i.e.,
identify whose is the poetic voice; tone; mood, synonymously called atmosphere; and the
metaphoric basis of the poem. In poetry, there may or may not be something like a plot.
A narrative poem or a dramatic monologue as developed by Robert Browning might have some
kind of a plot structure. However, poetry does have the progression of ideas and many
kinds of poetry have a diametric turn in the topic, such as sonnets
do.


Thirdly, you will identify and analyze the poetic
device of poetic techniques. Poetic techniques differ from poetic elements, though both
are poetic devices, in that they are optional additions used at the discretion and
choice of the poet. For example, aside from the prevailing poetic metaphor employed in
the construction of the poem, the use of metaphor and simile is up to the poet's choice.
Some poetic techniques are similes, personification, metonymy, irony, sarcasm (distinct
from irony by tone and intent), diction, and synecdoche.


As
to interpreting a poem, each of the points discussed above, structure, elements and
techniques, will reveal the meaning of the poem to you. Once you see the component parts
from theme to structure (e.g., underlying metaphor; diametrical turn in topic) to
diction to similes and all the rest, you will begin to see the deeper aspects of meaning
through the clarification of ideas, the juxtaposition of ideas, the multifaceted meaning
of ideas, the expansion of ideas, etc. Remember that structure plays a big part in
facilitating the interpretation of poetry, similar to the importance of structure in
fiction, as per one example, when the story is structured in a
frame.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

How Laura's internal conflict affected by Jim?

Jim affects Laura's internal conflict in that he is the
only support system whom she trusts blindly, and yet she can see clearly that he is
falling apart as badly as the rest of the family is. When Jim returns drunk from the
movie theatre he basically spells out his feelings towards their current
situation.


It must have been very scary for a character
with a personality like Laura's to see the head of the household, the savior of the
home, and the only man whom she can trust, her brother, lose his marbles and become
slowly an alcoholic. She is aware of her mother's incapacitation as she is less and less
reliable and more and more given to the past.


In
conclusion, watching her brother fall apart is definitely adding to Laura's already
traumatized existence.

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...