Sunday, August 4, 2013

How does the farm under Napoleon's leadership differ from the farm under Farmer Jones' rules?

Jones is a good example of all the evil that is in a
master-worker relationship. He is always easy, neglecting to feed the animals, so
somedays, the animals would be without food. He always come back home drunk and go into
his house without bothering to supply the animals with food. This led to widespread
suffering and starvation amongst the animals, so finally, he was driven out by the
animals in a spontaneous rebellion against him. Life would be much better without being
under Jones regime.


Napoleon, on the other-hand, is the
complete opposite. He brought about much comfort and peace in the farm, and thought of
new inventions to make the farm more technologically advanced, which boost crop yield in
the farm, so there was more food annually compared to Jones' time. But, the "paradise
land" brought about lots of tension and fear as many of them were killed in the process
for rebelling against Napoleon. So, in some way, it brought about some suffering among
the animals as they had to watch their back, in fear of being killed for being a
dissident.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...