Monday, December 23, 2013

In what significant ways are Jim and Huck alike and different?

I think the following points of comparison
are significant:


  • Both are very
    superstitious - which connects them in some ways, provides conflict
    at other times.

  • Both are running
    away
    and hiding in the process - this is the foundation for the entire
    novel.  The reason they need and rely on one another is due to this
    commonality.

  • Knowledge and
    education - while Huck has attempted formal schooling and Jim
    hasn't - both have a very mixed up view of the things they discuss on the river.  Both
    have obtained most of their knowledge from experience - rather than books (or someone
    else teaching them), which makes for some humorous stories, gullibility, but also a keen
    sense of right and wrong based on intuition.

  • Both, at the
    core of themselves, are kind hearted and mostly honest
    (with the important things), and this makes them genuine in their friendship
    with each other.

The significant differences
are a little more obvious:


  • Their ages
    - this provides a lot of opportunities for situational irony because Huck is
    just a child and Jim is a full grown man, but at times, the role reversal between the
    two is laughable.

  • The fact that Jim is a black
    slave
    and Huck is white and free (and subsequently
    wealthy though not by birth) - seems like it should create a big opportunity for
    conflict.  Again, ironically, the two not only get along - but manage to even disagree
    civilly when it comes to racial matters.  This is one obvious difference between them on
    the outside that doesn't affect them as much as it does others, on the outside.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...