In my opinion, this is because the work that engineers do
is not compatible with Taylorism. Taylorism is best used as a way of monitoring and
motivating relatively unskilled workers who are doing a job that requires little thought
or creativity. I do not think that engineers fit these
criteria.
Taylorism, to me, means the use of things like
time and motion studies. It is a way of breaking down the parts of a task to be sure
that the worker is performing each task as efficiently as possible. It can be used to
motivate workers because the time and motion study can tell a manager how long the task
should be taking. The manager can then basically tell the
worker "you're not going fast enough -- speed up or be
fired."
I do not think that you can motivate skilled
workers in this way, especially if they are doing a task that needs thought. You cannot
tell them "think faster." You cannot really break down the task either -- you can't
really say "you have 1 hour to think about this part of the
design..."
Because engineers are doing skilled work that
requires thought, Taylorism is not useful in motivating them, in my
opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment