The only valid criteria for deciding "who should control
Kashmir" are, what the people of Kashmir want, and what is in their best
interests.
As things stands today, there is no clear
indication of what the people of Kashmir want. So a decision cannot be taken on that
basis. Then, if the decision is to be based on the interest of the Kashmiri people,
becoming a part of India is definitely better than becoming a part of Pakistan. There
are two main advantages for the Kashmiris to join
India..
First, comparing the past record of economic and
social development, India definitely offers better prospects than Pakistan.The economic
development in India has been much faster than in Pakistan. In addition, people have
greater personal freedom. Pakistan has experienced may political instabilities, and
dictatorial rule by military personnel who seized power by force, and adopted many
oppressive practices to keep themselves in power.
The
second benefit will be a more progressive society. This means equal status and
opportunities for people of all religion, and also greater developed social systems of
people of every religion, in line with technological, economical and social challenges
of the twenty first century, characterized by rapid globalization. The past record of
Pakistan in this respect has been very poor. Pakistan is officially a Muslim country
while India is a secular country. Also, the Hindus living in Pakistan have been severely
discriminated against. This indicates to a very high probability that Hindus will face
major major set backs by choosing to join Pakistan.
The
Muslims will also suffer by missing the opportunity of moving ahead with time, rather
than being tied down to the ritualistic aspects of their religion. A better alternative
will be for them to concentrate on the core valus of their religion rather be
preoccupied with rigid ritualistic practices. India offers better opportunities for such
development.
No comments:
Post a Comment