Saturday, October 11, 2014

Describe the alternatives to a jury trial that exist for deciding a lawsuit.Identifying Alternatives.

There is no legal requirement that lawsuits be settled by
jury at all.  The decision can rest in the hands of a judge alone.  Having a jury,
though is usually to the advantage of the defendant, because you have a statistically
better chance of avoiding a conviction if a majority of 12 have to make the ruling as
opposed to merely one, so you tend to see more jury trials in lawsuits than
not.


Another alternative is called binding arbitration.  To
avoid the prolonged time frame and cost of a trial, both sides submit to the decision of
a third party arbitrator, someone who weighs the evidence individually and his/her
decision is final, as both sides must waive their right to appeal to use this option. 
Many times, a plaintiff will choose this option because by avoiding all of the appeals,
they can be assured of getting some money much sooner.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment on the setting and character of "The Fall of the House of Usher."How does setting act as a character?

Excellent observation, as it identifies how the settings of Poe's stories reflect the characters of their protagonists. Whet...